THE Scottish Government has hit out at the Home Office for using children as “pawns” over plans to use MRI scanners to determine the age of asylum seekers.
Speaking to The Herald, Scotland’s Minister for Children Natalie Don said the proposals put forward by the UK Government were “incompatible with the progressive, inclusive values of people in Scotland”.
However, the Home Office said the use of the medical test was necessary to “remove incentives for adults to pretend to be children in order to remain in the UK”.
Tory immigration minister Robert Jenrick (below) confirmed the plans to use X-rays of teeth, hands and wrists as well as MRI scans of knees and collar bones to determine the age of asylum seekers last month as part of the Illegal Migration Act 2023.
Home Office figures show that between January 2016 and June 2023, of the 30,114 asylum applications made by unaccompanied under 18s, age was disputed in 11,275 cases with 5551 found to be adults.
Under the new laws, anyone who refuses an age assessment will have this counted against them when their asylum claim is processed.
In a letter to Jenrick, Don said the Scottish Government “is deeply troubled by the Home Office’s pursuit of this policy”.
She added that age assessments were “best led by social workers with care and wellbeing needs at the forefront of the process”.
READ MORE: Robert Jenrick labelled 'delusional' for economy claim in BBC interview
Don added there had been cases of “young people presenting to local authorities having been incorrectly age assessed via a ‘brief enquiry’ at the port of entry and subsequently placed in adult asylum accommodation”.
Speaking to The Herald, she said: “The Scottish Government is fundamentally opposed to these controversial plans which risk the rights of children who’ve already been through unimaginable hardship, threatens them with being forced to leave the country and which have been condemned by human rights groups across the world.
“The UK Government is using children who’ve already suffered incredible trauma as pawns, as they continue to fuel a culture war in an attempt to appeal to the most extreme voices.
“The Scottish Government will continue to oppose these reprehensible plans. How we treat unaccompanied asylum seeking children is a question of values – and the values of the UK Government are incompatible with the progressive, inclusive values of people in Scotland.”
There are also fears from some refugee charities that the scans can only give a possible range, rather than an exact age.
They believe the consequences of an incorrect age assessment could lead to minors running away from care settings.
The Humans For Rights Network said the rules could ultimately force children “into harmful exploitative situations” while the Society of Radiographers and the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health have also criticised the measures.
READ MORE: Justice Secretary defends First Minister's council tax freeze pledge
In response to Don’s comments, a Home Office spokesperson said: “It’s vital that we remove incentives for adults to pretend to be children in order to remain in the UK.
“We are strengthening the age verification process through the National Age Assessment Board, introducing scientific assessments, such as x-rays, and measures under the Illegal Migration Act which will help ensure assessments are robust and further protect children.
“We will only treat someone claiming to be a child as an adult if two officers have separately determined that the individual’s physical appearance and demeanour very strongly suggests they are significantly over 18 years of age.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel