MORE authors have joined calls for the Scottish investment bank Baillie Gifford to cut ties with the fossil fuel industry.
In August, climate activist Greta Thunberg cancelled an appearance at the Edinburgh International Book Festival due to the event being sponsored by Baillie Gifford.
She said she could not attend due to Baillie Gifford’s investments in the fossil fuel industry and said its sponsorship of cultural events amounted to “greenwashing”.
The group Fossil Free Books (FFB) has since issued a statement calling on the 12 book festivals currently sponsored by Baillie Gifford to urge the company to divest from fossil fuels.
Co-signed by respected authors such as Naomi Klein, Ben Okri, Max Porter and Rebecca Solnit, it read: “In August, at the start of the Edinburgh International Books Festival, hundreds of authors came together to ask Baillie Gifford to divest from fossil fuels.
“Now, as Fossil Free Books, we are urging all UK literature festivals currently receiving sponsorship from Baillie Gifford to call on Baillie Gifford to divest.
“These festivals often platform vital conversations and concerns about the urgency of the climate crisis.
“To address the material reality behind these conversations, we cannot allow fossil fuel investments to fund these events.”
However, the director of Borders Book Festival, Alistair Moffat, said that the calls amounted to “self-righteousness against complexity”.
“Two weeks ago, we had a schools’ day in Hawick for 1,300 primary school kids,” he said.
READ MORE: SNP force Labour to clarify position on devolving employment law
“Baillie Gifford paid for each of them to receive a book for free. These children aren’t investing in fossil fuels.
“The folk demanding that Baillie Gifford divest from fossil fuels are not interested in dialogue.
“They just say, ‘Get rid of them or we can’t come. You shouldn’t take the money.’ “It’s self-righteousness against complexity”.
Baillie Gifford states that only 2% of its clients’ money is invested in companies connected to fossil fuels, compared to an 11% market average.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel