KEIR Starmer’s conference speech has been welcomed by one of the UK’s most influential right-wing think tanks for setting out a “serious, positive” vision for the country.
The Adam Smith Institute, a neoliberal think tank said to have inspired controversial privatisations during the Thatcher and Major governments and influenced Liz Truss's disatrous "mini-budget", said the Labour leader was right that “politics should tread lightly on people’s lives”.
And it said it looked forward to seeing his ambitions for Britain fleshed out to “fix our country and boost living standards”.
READ MORE: Keir Starmer Labour conference speech interrupted by protester
Starmer used his keynote conference speech to delegates in Liverpool – during which he was confronted by a glitter-throwing protester - to make a direct pitch to Tory voters to join Labour.
He invited Conservative supporters who looked on “in horror at the descent of your party into the murky waters of populism and conspiracy” to join his party.
He also promised to “bulldoze” his way through restrictions to build a new Britain, with modern homes and businesses and an NHS “back on its feet”.
In the wake of Rishi Sunak’s speech to the Conservative conference, the Institute had criticised the UK government for being focused on “catchy diktats rather than on the long-term decisions this country really needs”.
Economist Richard Murphy, professor of accounting practice at Sheffield University, wrote on X/Twitter: “The deeply right-wing Adam Smith Institute loves Keir Starmer and cannot abide Rishi Sunak.
“Is there any more evidence that you need on how far Labour has moved to the right?”
In a statement following Starmer’s speech, the Institute’s director of research Maxwell Marlow said: “Keir Starmer put forward a serious, innovation-focused, positive vision for the country. He is right that politics should tread lightly on people’s lives, and we hope that, should he succeed in bringing Labour to power, he holds true to this statement.”
Marlow said it was also “refreshing” to hear Starmer talk about reforms to public services, so that “they work for the people who use them”, including using technology and artificial intelligence to improve the NHS – but criticised a pledge to remove the VAT exemption on private schools.
READ MORE: SNP maintain narrow lead over Labour in YouGov General Election poll
“We look forward to seeing Keir Starmer’s ambitions for Britain fleshed out with more concrete policy ideas to fix our country and boost living standards for ordinary Brits,” he added.
The Adam Smith Institute had initially welcomed the plans laid out by Liz Truss and Kwasi Kwarteng – which led to economic chaos – before saying mistakes were made with the strategy, including the scale of proposed tax cuts.
Meanwhile the SNP criticised Starmer for remaining wedded to “Tory austerity cuts, Brexit and the same damaging Westminster policies that got the UK into this mess”.
SNP social justice spokesperson David Linden said: "Families are suffering from the soaring cost of living in the UK and need help right now - but Sir Keir failed to outline a single policy to help households this winter, and his admission the Labour Party will continue to impose a hard Tory Brexit will choke off economic growth permanently.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel