THE Scottish Conservatives have blamed “tactical voting” for their loss in the Rutherglen and Hamilton West by-election.
It comes after the party’s candidate Thomas Kerr lost his £500 deposit after failing to win 5% of the vote.
Just 3.9% of voters – 1192 people – backed Kerr while the SNP won 8399 votes and Labour picked up 17 845 votes.
However, a number of Scottish Tory MSPs have blamed the loss on “tactical voting”.
Writing on Twitter/X, MSP Stephen Kerr said: “Perhaps before getting too carried away re #RutherglenandHamiltonWest, there was clearly a v high level of tactical voting as a result of intense by election campaigning, such campaigning wont’ be repeatable in a general election.”
Speaking to Good Morning Scotland meanwhile, MSP Miles Briggs (below) said he was still optimistic about the results despite the defeat.
“When I was helping our candidate, from the conversations I had it was clear [tactical voting] was the motivation in this by-election – they wanted to make sure the SNP would not be returning an MP,” he told the BBC.
Briggs added that he thought an “SNP wipe-out” is within reach and that Unionist voters would push Labour or Tory candidates over the line.
Scottish Secretary Alister Jack (below) meanwhile also reacted to the result, saying he would rather Kerr hadn’t lost his deposit but that the by-election was always a “two-horse race”.
He told the PA news agency: “I am confident, very confident, we will increase our seats by a good number come the general election.
“We have to be realistic. These are parts of the central belt which have always been a battle between Labour and the SNP. And that’s just how politics works.
“Just as there are parts of the country that are a battle between the Conservatives and the SNP.”
READ MORE: John Curtice: 'Uncertain' if Labour have 'sealed the deal' with electorate
Jack added that his party “stands up for the strongest for the Union” and that the SNP’s loss showed voters “are fed up with a lack of delivery from the Scottish Government and their obsession with independence”.
We previously told how the Scottish Tory chair claimed Unionist voters will switch from Labour to the Tories just as Tory voters switched to Labour in the Rutherglen and Hamilton West by-election.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel