THE “scale of the mess” in which Labour left Glasgow’s finances has been underlined by reports that the city faces a bill of £1.5 billion, the SNP have said.
The party’s Glasgow group, which controls Scotland’s most populous local authority, hit out after analysis in the Sunday Mail revealed the cost the city faces due to equal pay claims dating back to Labour’s time in charge.
In 2022, it was announced that Glasgow Council had agreed to pay around £770 million to settle equal pay claims after discussions with workers represented by Action 4 Equality, the GMB, Unison and Unite unions.
This was formed of some £550m agreed in 2019, and another newly approved £220m.
READ MORE: Humza Yousaf blasts 'colossal abdication of leadership' by Rishi Sunak
Glasgow Council had previously approved plans to fund the equal pay settlement by selling key council-owned buildings – including the city chambers and the Kelvingrove Art Gallery – to an arm’s length company before leasing them back.
But it then stressed the buildings will remain in the city’s ownership and people will not experience any difference accessing them on a day-to-day basis.
Reports in the Sunday Mail said that, over 30 years, Glasgow Council would end up paying out some £1.5bn in order to service loans of £770m.
That paper reported that the £550m loan will see service repayments of around £938m, while the less favourable rates on the later £220m loan could cost as much as £608m.
The SNP Glasgow group said the figures were “a stark reminder of the scale of the mess Labour left the city's finances in and the job we have had to do to sort them out”.
READ MORE: Maker of indyref documentary hails atmosphere of 2014 in Scotland
They went on: “With Birmingham essentially declaring bankruptcy we can see what would have happened if the city had been left in their incompetent hands.”
A council source told the Sunday Mail: “Nobody is suggesting that the workers, mainly women, who are receiving payouts are not entitled to them, however the financial impact of this will be felt for decades.
“The council is effectively mortgaging off all of the valuable buildings it owns, putting them up as collateral.”
Glasgow Council leader Susan Aitken (below) said: “I made it a priority to put right years of pay inequality in Glasgow. I’m very proud of the progress we have made and to be nearing the end of what has been an enormous challenge.
“The price of discrimination is a high one and Glasgow will be paying it for a long time.
“However, if years of fighting women workers that were seeking justice was perhaps the worst thing this council has done; then I believe the effort over the past five years to bring us to this point has been among the best.
“It has been a hard road. It has been fraught and it has been painful at times – but it has been essential to right an egregious wrong.”
In 2022, then Glasgow Labour leader Malcolm Cunning said the idea his party were solely to blame for the hefty bill to come from the equal pay dispute was “a false characterisation of what happened”.
Speaking at a Glasgow Times hustings ahead of the local elections, he added: “I do think it’s unfortunate to some extent there’s a mythology grown up around this.”
He said the SNP, Tories and even Tommy Sheridan’s Solidarity Party had voted for the system that eventually led to the equal pay scandal.
But Aitken said: “I don’t want to get into competing mythologies here but there were several things in Councillor Cunning’s account there with which I take issue – but I can certainly say the hard work has all been done by this SNP administration.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel