THE maker of a new documentary on Scotland’s independence vote has said the debates of 2014 were signs of a “healthy society” and the “more referendums the better”.
Jane McAllister, who spent hours filming her father Fraser as he campaigned for Yes, said one lesson from the time was that people became politically engaged as they felt their opinions mattered – no matter which side they were on.
But she also cautioned that from the independence campaign side, the “hard work” involved in trying to win votes for Yes may have been underestimated.
READ MORE: Pat Kane: Why we should support documentary about Yes in 2014
Speaking during a Q&A session at the premiere of the film To See Ourselves at the Glasgow Film Theatre last week, hosted by National columnist Pat Kane, McAllister said one theme emerging from it was that everyone “felt they had power” in the run-up to the referendum.
“Everyone felt they had agency and I think that feeling that your opinion mattered, whatever side you were on, gave you such energy and excitement,” she said.
“When I went down the street, I would turn the camera on and people would just come up and tell me about economics and the EU.
“It is incredible and I think that’s a healthy society. I think the more referenda we can have the better, and the more politics is in everyone’s lives. People feeling like they have action and agency is important.”
READ MORE: Scottish independence film offers a fresh look at 2014 referendum
However, she questioned whether presenting statistics and facts would help win the case for independence – arguing it is “all based on emotion”.
She said one difficulty is how to shift people who are “set in their identities” and when it comes to making the case for Yes, it is the “conversations on the door” which were important in winning votes.
She said: “The stalls are amazing, the marches are great, but it really is going to come down to people being empowered … it is going out on the street, but it is hard work, and people don’t necessarily have the time to do that.”
Her father Fraser, who was an SNP councillor at the time of the referendum, said the lasting impression of the campaigning was that it was a “democratic revolution” in which the whole country was awakened to politics.
“For us, it was almost like the summer of love, it was so optimistic towards the end, and you were meeting the kindest, gentlest people,” he said.
He also argued that the case for Yes could now be made by not focusing solely on the reasons for Scotland to become independent.
“We say why do we need the Union? – you prove to me what is good about the Union. That’s not an easy thing to do, and I think we have to exploit this push-away as well as the pull towards independence.
“In [Boris] Johnson, we probably had the most corrupt prime minister for 100 years, his successor was the dumbest, most criminally incompetent.
“So the push-away now has to be recognised … turn it on its head, which is often the way to win an argument.”
He added: “We have to engage with emotions, but we also have to engage with intellect, there are reasons and people want to know the answers to borders and currency.
“We should be able to provide that – the answers are out there.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel