THE Home Office is paying “around £8 million” per day for asylum seekers to be placed in hotels.
The figure comes from the department’s annual report and accounts for 2022-23, and contradicts the £6 million daily cost cited by Home Secretary Suella Braverman in the Commons on Monday.
Labour’s home affairs spokeswoman Yvette Cooper called the bill for hotels “astronomical,” adding that the Conservatives had “busted the Home Office budget".
On Monday, Braverman told the Commons “it is not right that we continue to house tens of thousands of migrants in hotels, in towns and cities across the country, costing the taxpayer £6m a day”.
READ MORE: Scottish Government to be involved in key talks on banning XL bully dogs
She continued: “That is why our work to roll out large sites is moving swiftly, and we propose to move asylum seekers on to them as soon as possible.”
Asylum seekers have reported poor living conditions in larger sites such as the Manston asylum centre in Kent, where cases of diphtheria have been reported.
Last month, 39 migrants were moved off the Bibby Stockholm barge (below) – which had been fitted with extra bunk beds to double its capacity to 500 – after Legionella bacteria was found in the water supply.
The annual report by the Home Office states: “We need to stop the boats to relieve the unsustainable pressure on our asylum system and accommodation services, which is costing over £3 billion a year”.
It continues: “We must take action to address the unacceptable costs of housing migrants in hotels.”
Research published in the House of Commons Library claims that at the end of March 2023, around 47,500 people (42% of people in receipt of asylum support) were in hotel accomodation.
This compares to around 9500 asylum seekers in hotels in October 2020.
Yet the report states that even if the Home Office meets its target to procure 350 new beds each week, in addition to its target on the number of asylum decisions made, it would still need to use hotel accommodation.
READ MORE: SNP councillor hopes to become Scotland's first refugee MP
The report adds that ministers have not publicly expressed a specific timeframe for ending the use of hotel accommodation, amid criticism that recent measures have focused on adding accommodation capacity rather than reducing the use of hotels.
Migrants staying in hotel accommodation have reported poor living conditions with overcrowding, a lack of food and no change of clothes.
Earlier this month, the Home Office was criticised for proposing to introduce enforced room sharing for asylum seekers at hotels in Scotland.
The Home Office annual report refers to the Illegal Migration Bill, introduced in March, as a solution, citing that it “goes further than ever before to do what is necessary” so that people know “they cannot skip the queue by coming here illegally.”
The bill is designed to give powers to deport asylum seekers arriving via unauthorised routes either back to their home country or to Rwanda.
Braverman said the deal struck by the Home Office to send asylum seekers to Rwanda will act as a “deterrent”.
Speaking in the Commons on Monday, she said: “We need a robust and honest approach to dealing with this problem.
“Opening our doors to thousands of migrants from the EU is not the solution.
“We need a deterrent, and that is why our agreement with Rwanda will work.”
Yvette Cooper criticised Home Office spending, saying that “the British people are playing the price”.
She continued: “This report illustrates the staggering costs of the Tories’ asylum chaos, with the taxpayer now spending an astronomical £8 million a day on hotels and the costs still going up and up.
“That is the price of the Conservatives’ utter failure to get a grip on this issue – now costing over £3 billion a year.
READ MORE: EU urged to make Catalan official language for 'linguistic equality'
“Shockingly, the cost of hotel accommodation has gone up by a third since Rishi Sunak promised to end hotel use.
“The Tories have busted the Home Office budget, they’ve broken the asylum system, and the British people are paying the price.”
The department’s spending has come under recent criticism as it was reported that it would cost less to house migrants on a Disney cruise than the Bibby Stockholm.
According to Private Eye, it would cost £18m to house 500 refugees on the Bibby Stockholm barge for a year.
Meanwhile, it has been claimed that it would cost £15.25m to send 500 refugees on a Disney cruise for a year.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel