THE BBC is facing questions amid claims Russell Brand used its car service to take a teenage girl from her school to his home.
The woman, who accuses Brand of grooming and sexual assault, told The Times she was taken to and from the comedian and actor’s home in north London in chauffeur-driven car paid for by the corporation.
The claims come as part of an in-depth investigation by The Times, Sunday Times and Channel 4 into allegations against Brand, including rape and sexual assault, made by four women.
He has strongly denied the accusations against him and said all of his relationships have been consensual.
The woman, who has been referred to in reporting as Alice, said she once had to punch Brand in the stomach after he allegedly forced his penis down her throat, causing her to choke.
Brand (below) was 30 and working as a presenter on BBC 2 when Alice says she met him aged 16.
She told The Times: “The first time I used [the BBC car], he told me it was booked to take him to his radio show but he had a friend taking him instead so I should use that car.”
She said that the BBC driver “took me to my grandma’s house one day from Russell’s house. And then when the car picked me up from school, it was the same car . . . I knew that that was a BBC car”.
READ MORE: Scottish comedian claims 'WhatsApp groups' made to 'warn' about Russell Brand
Brand resigned from the BBC amid a scandal after he and fellow BBC Radio 2 DJ Jonathan Ross left messages on actor Andrew Sachs’s (above) answering machine, claiming he had slept with the Fawlty Towers star’s granddaughter.
'Turning a blind eye'
Caroline Dinenage, chairwoman of the culture, media and sport committee said: “Once again in this case we hear of media companies 'open secrets' and 'turning a blind eye'.
“It’s hard to see how we will be able to ignore this. The committee will be meeting on Tuesday morning to determine our approach.”
The BBC told The Times it had clear expectations and polices around conduct at work and insisted it had taken the Sachs affair seriously.
A spokesperson added: “We hope that demonstrates that the BBC takes issues seriously and is prepared to act.
READ MORE: GB News hosts signal support for Russell Brand amid abuse allegations
“Indeed, we would add that in addition to acting on the serious editorial breach at the time, the BBC has, over successive years, evolved its approach to how it manages talent and indeed how it deals with complaints or issues raised.
“We will always listen to people if they come forward with any concerns, on any issue related to any individual working at the BBC — past or present.”
The outlets leading the investigation into Brand have said they gave the entertainer, who now broadcasts conspiracy theories on his popular YouTube channel, eight days to reply to detailed allegations.
Lawyers for Brand reportedly complained they were not in a position to respond to the “large litany of questions” posed by the outlets and claimed there was a “deeply concerning agenda to all this, namely the fact that he is an alternative media broadcaster competing with mainstream media”.
In a video statement posted to social media before the story broke, Brand claimed there was a mainstream media conspiracy against him which involved “some very serious allegations that I absolutely refute”.
A spokesperson for the Metropolitan Police said: "We are aware of media reporting of a series of allegations of sexual assault.
"At this time, we have not received any reports in relation to this. If anyone believes they have been the victim of a sexual assault we would encourage them to contact police.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel