FREEPORTS are a repeat of the failed "trickle-down economics" experiment of the 1980s, a Scottish Greens MSP has said.
Ross Greer was the only MSP on the Finance and Public Administration Committee to oppose legislation enabling two Scottish freeports and their associated tax breaks on Tuesday.
Goods imported into freeports are exempt from taxes, called tariffs, that are normally paid to the UK Government. It means manufacturers in freeports can import raw materials tariff-free, only paying tariffs on finished products leaving the site for elsewhere in the UK.
In his questioning of the Minister for Community Wealth and Public Finance, Tom Arthur, Greer highlighted that the tax breaks provided would apply even to companies based in overseas tax havens such as the Cayman Islands and that there are no requirements for businesses operating in the freeports to pay their workers decent wages or to recognise trade unions.
READ MORE: Hilarious sticker spotted on Scottish Border sign ahead of England match
Inverness and Cromarty Firth Green Freeport and Forth Green Freeport have been selected jointly by the Scottish Government and UK Government as the locations for Scotland’s first green freeports.
Speaking after the vote, Greer said: “These freeports are certainly not green. They’re a repeat of a failed Tory experiment in trickle-down economics, essentially creating mini tax havens that allow corporations to get out of paying their fair share to support the NHS and other services that we all rely on.
“The freeport experiment of the 1980s only worsened inequality by moving jobs around the country rather than creating new ones. In the case of these Scottish freeports there is a real risk of jobs being moved from a west coast already struggling with depopulation to an east coast which, in relative terms, is thriving.
“Internationally, but especially in Europe, freeports are associated with organised crime, especially money laundering, smuggling and the exploitation of workers. That presents a major risk to Scotland’s international reputation.
“Devolution allows us to do things differently in Scotland. Given the absolute disaster that is the UK’s Tory government, different is exactly what we should be aiming for.
“The Scottish Greens want the eye watering profits of big business to be reinvested in our communities, not squirrelled offshore to tax havens.”
Trickle-down economics
This was a term used to describe the belief that if high-income earners gain an increase in their salary, then everyone in the economy will benefit as their wealth filters down to all sections of society.
It is thought by some that if high-income earners see an increase in disposable income, they will increase their spending and this will create additional demand in the economy. The theory is this higher level of aggregate demand then creates jobs and higher wages for all workers.
The UK set up seven freeports after 1984, including ones at Liverpool and Southampton, but these were phased out in 2012.
The Scottish Government has called the sites "green" freeports, because bids had to include plans for lowering carbon emissions.
But the Greens say there are "no hard requirements" to meet the climate targets.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here