ORGANISERS of a planned mass demonstration in favour of Scottish independence say they have been blocked from using a key route.
Chain of Freedom organiser Wilma Bowie said her plans for part of a massive human chain had been blocked by Scottish Canals.
She told The National the organisation had blocked the demo from lining along the Union Canal, which runs between Falkirk and Edinburgh, meaning the group will now have to use the Forth and Clyde Canal, which links Falkirk with Bowling in West Dunbartonshire.
They are said to have told the Chain of Freedom organisers that the plans were unsafe.
READ MORE: Chain of Freedom plan update after canal rejection
It will mean, if the plans are successful, 49,000 people will line the canal path between the Firth of Forth and the west coast on October 14.
This is down from an estimated 77,000 needed to line the longer proposed route from Bowling to Edinburgh. The new route is nearly 20 miles shorter than initially planned.
Bowie told The National: “Scottish Canals has denied us permission to use the Union Canal for our Chain of Freedom Scotland event, citing health and safety reasons, and that it is not fit for the purpose of our event.
"However, we are able to undertake the event on the Forth and Clyde Canals.
"We will not let this deter us and makes our will to show Westminster, the Unionists and the people of the wider world that Scotland does want her independence, even stronger.
"As we are all responsible organisers that know the importance of health and safety and our team agreed to accept the decision of Scottish Canals as the safety of our people are paramount.
"We have now refocused our efforts. With great time and effort our team have now rearranged thousands of people into suggested new sections along the length of the Forth and Clyde canal as alternatives to the Union Canal.
"We have distributed these via email and also our social media."
READ MORE: Scottish independence Chain of Freedom demo plans reach major milestone
Richard Millar, the chief operating officer of Scottish Canals said Chain of Freedom had agreed with the organisation it would be unsafe to stand along the Union Canal.
He said: "In discussions with the Chain of Freedom organisers we highlighted that the Union Canal towpath was too narrow for this scale of event and would significantly impact users on the popular route, reviewing the path they agreed with our recommendations and have now focused on the Forth and Clyde Canal which is wider and more suited to welcoming this scale of visitors.
"We received a revised plan from Chain of Freedom yesterday and our discussion regarding the event planning and risk assessments continue.
“As this is a major event (75,000 plus), which impacts much wider than our canal towpath, for example local access routes and welfare facilities, we have asked the organisers to provide assurances that they have engaged appropriately with local authorities and Police Scotland.
"We will continue to liaise with the organisers on these points.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel