THE First Minister has confirmed that the SNP's Holyrood group will meet to discuss the future of MSP Fergus Ewing.
It comes after the Inverness MSP voted to sack Scottish Greens co-leader Lorna Slater earlier this year as he criticised her handling of the deposit return scheme (DRS).
Last week, he joined the Tories, Labour and LibDems to call on Humza Yousaf (below) to pause the short-term lets licensing scheme.
The former rural economy secretary said the “misconceived, costly and bureaucratic” system should be paused or it would cause “irreparable damage” to the sector.
The First Minister has said that Ewing’s behaviour was “serious” and that the Holyrood group would meet to discuss his future.
It was previously reported that Ewing was facing the loss of the whip although it’s been suggested that the death of his mother Winnie paused any action.
READ MORE: It's time to push for an energy social tariff for the benefit of all
Regarding Ewing’s decision to side with the Tories over Slater on the DRS, Yousaf told the Daily Record: “It was a very serious matter indeed. And there was, I think, understandable reasons why the group chose not to deal with internal party discipline at the end of the parliamentary term, but clearly the group may want to pick those matters up when they return.
“There’s not been a resolution to that issue. Voting against a government minister on a vote of confidence and voting with the Conservatives in that regard is a serious matter.
“So the group will meet to discuss that and it’s an internal matter which I don’t intend to comment on anymore.”
Ewing has also been critical of the Bute House Agreement of late, having called for a fresh vote on the power-sharing agreement at the beginning of August.
READ MORE: The time to discuss Scotland's place in Europe is now
The agreement was backed by around 95% of SNP members when it was created in 2021 although Ewing said he expected a fresh vote would produce a “very different” result.
He has also previously dismissed the Greens as “wine bar revolutionaries” and referred to them as “extremists.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel