A CALL has been made for SNP members to back a “resetting of the relationship” with rural Scotland following the controversy over Highly Protected Marine Areas (HPMAs).
A motion has been put forward by the SNP Peterhead branch for debate at the party conference later this year calling for the Scottish Government to “empower rather than impose” policy on local communities.
It welcomes the decision by ministers to halt the HPMA legislation, following a consultation which sparked more than 4000 responses including serious concerns from islanders.
The motion says the proposals should only come back to Holyrood once “consensus among key stakeholders has been reached”.
Branch members say there were concerns the issue was being “raised on the doorstep” and it is hoped the discussion will “chart a way forward” on how such policies will proceed in the future.
READ MORE: Review: Lib Dem leader Alex Cole-Hamilton’s AirBnB
They say the resolution has been written by Peterhead and Banff branch members, with input from the fishing industry, coastal community groups and people working in conservation and it aims to “devolve and empower policy over marine protection to coastal communities”.
David Birkett, convener of the SNP Peterhead branch said: “In the North-East there is a feeling that government in Edinburgh or London can be equally out of touch.
“When I, a loyal SNP member, started to feel that too, well let’s just say it wasn’t pleasant.
“Successive out-of-touch UK governments from Edward Heath’s to Boris Johnson’s have let our seafood sector down, and I was glad to see the SNP-led Scottish Government pull back from the precipice of joining that long list of let-downs.
“I’m proud that our branch is leading on this important issue and look forward to playing our part in getting this right.”
The motion, which is on the draft agenda for the SNP conference taking place in Aberdeen in October, states: “Conference commends the Scottish Government for suspending the implementation of HPMA’s allowing a new pathway and timetable surrounding any roll-out of similar measures in the future.
READ MORE: Organisers say momentum is back after Edinburgh independence rally
“Conference believes that the Scottish Government must remain committed to protecting Scotland’s marine ecosystems, but in such a way that minimises the impact on coastal communities and maximises opportunities for all.
“Conference believes that the Scottish Government must work constructively with all key stakeholders including local industry and businesses impacted by these 11 proposals, as well as coastal communities.
“The process must arrive at a position where the marine environment and our coastal communities can thrive, which will be in Scotland’s best economic, cultural and environmental interests. Any new proposal should only come back to Parliament once consensus among key stakeholders has been reached.”
In July, Mairi McAllan announced HPMAs would no longer be implemented by the Scottish Government in 10% of the country’s waters by 2026 as planned. The Net Zero Secretary said delaying the date was due to concern raised over the short timeframe ministers had to work with coastal communities to deliver the plans.
READ MORE: BBC faces criticism for writing off Scotland in Rugby World Cup
One Peterhead branch official told the Sunday National: “It’s essential that when we get things wrong, we hold our hands up and press pause, and on HPMA, we got things very wrong.
“The biggest challenge we face on the doors when it comes to independence here is always the question of why replace London, which does not understand rural Scotland, with Edinburgh, which does not understand Scotland. It is within our gift to banish this feeling in rural Scotland that unwanted policy is imposed on rural Scotland by urban Scotland, and that starts here.
The branch official added: “Passing this resolution in October would be a powerful message that the SNP have pressed reset on our relationship with rural Scotland and reaffirm that the SNP are the national party of all of Scotland.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel