THE RSPB have been criticised for “backpedaling” and apologising for calling Rishi Sunak and Michael Gove “liars” for weakening environmental protections.
The conservation charity yesterday vented its “frustration” on X, formerly known as Twitter, at the Prime Minister, Housing Secretary and Environment Secretary Therese Coffey.
The post, which has been viewed over five million times, called out the three Tory ministers for rowing back on environmental protections over UK Government plans to scrap pollution rules to build new homes near areas such as rivers and waterways.
READ MORE: Anas Sarwar: I don't support the devolution of drug laws to Scotland
“You lie, and you lie, and you lie again. And we’ve had enough,” the UK's largest conservation charity wrote, following up with a thread of quotes from all three ministers and manifesto pledges from the Tories.
But, less than 12 hours later the charity rowed back on their comments and said that “frustration led us to attack the people not the policy”.
“This falls below the standard we set ourselves and for that we apologise,” the RSPB wrote.
“We will continue to campaign vigorously on behalf of nature but we will always do so in a polite and considered manner.”
The apology led many social media users and commentators to hit out in frustration at the row back from the charity.
Writer George Monbiot said: “I'm deeply frustrated by @RSPBEngland's timidity. It *should* attack both the UK's disastrous policies and the authors of those policies.
“It was right to say that Sunak, Gove and Coffey lied. It was wrong to apologise. We need bold, assertive defenders of the natural world.”
Dr Charlotte Lydia Riley added: “People make policies! You can’t attack “policies” in this vague manner and not hold specific people accountable.
READ MORE: No short-term let applications have been rejected in Scotland
“The campaign was good; this backpedaling is disappointing.”
Mark Avery, co-founder of the group Wild Justice, said: “Oh dear! Obviously you got one of these wrong. Personally, I think it was the retraction.”
Non-profit Protect The Wild wrote: “Real shame to see this. Say it how it is. This Government is full of liars who don’t give a s*** about the environment.”
Conservationist Dr Charlie Gardner added: “If politicians have demonstrably lied, it is entirely appropriate to call them liars “It is ok to 'attack the people not the policy' - leaders should take personal responsibility for the decisions they make, and be held accountable for them.”
Just Stop Oil said their respect for the RSPB “went up briefly - and then back down”, and called Tory politicians “environmental arsonists”.
Conservative politicians and supporters attacked the charity despite the apology.
Joe Porter, a member of Staffordshire Moorlands District Council, said: “As a Conservative councillor, I've proudly supported many of your campaigns, but your initial actions spoke volumes.
“Politics needs less division and personal attacks, especially given what's happened to two MPs in recent years. As a charity, I hope you will be better in future.”
READ MORE: Scottish Tory MSPs 'frustrated' with Douglas Ross's leadership
Ed McGuinness, a former Tory candidate, complained that the initial post was still up.
He said: “The images were also deliberately designed - therefore premeditated. Pathetic apology.”
The row erupted after ministers confirmed on Tuesday that EU-era rules that force housebuilders to mitigate the impact that new developments have on river health are set to be scrapped as part of plans to build 100,000 new homes in England by 2030.
The UK Government has argued that the measure would benefit the economy, and that new developments contribute a small amount to nutrient pollution. They also promised extra funding to offset any increase.
The current rules prevent new developments in protected areas where they would add harmful nutrients, such as nitrogen or phosphorus, into nearby waters as they can cause algal blooms that deprive other plants and animals of light and oxygen.
The RSPB were not the only nature charity to criticise the move, with the Wildlife Trust’s chief describing it as “disgraceful”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel