THE Scottish Conservatives have said they will hold a debate and force a vote on the short-term lets licensing scheme before the October deadline.
The sector has been calling for a second delay to the scheme to be introduced, but this has been ruled out repeatedly by First Minister Humza Yousaf.
The deadline had already been extended by six months to October 1, and it will be a criminal offence to let either a room in a home or an entire property after this point without a license.
READ MORE: Douglas Ross offers to back SNP rebels in vote to undo Bute House deal
The scheme covers bed and breakfasts, guest houses and self-catering sites, but will not apply to hotels.
It requires hosts to display energy performance ratings on listings, have adequate buildings and public liability insurance, as well as various fire and gas safety precautions.
Douglas Ross told business leaders and party members on Tuesday the decision was “bitterly disappointing” and would result in businesses closing their doors.
Speaking during a keynote speech on the economy at Edinburgh’s Apex Hotel on Tuesday, Ross (below) said his opposition party would use the allocated parliamentary time to hold a debate on future delays and push a vote on MSPs in an attempt to stop the implementation in just over a month’s time.
Fiona Campbell, chief executive of the Association of Scotland’s Self-Caterers (ASSC), asked Ross during the Tuesday event to urge the Tories to step in to prevent businesses signing up to the scheme “under duress”.
She said the Scottish Government were “fully aware” of unlawful schemes across Scotland, including in cities like Glasgow and Dundee, but “were forcing people, under legal duress, to apply for these schemes nonetheless”.
Ross replied: “I was bitterly disappointed when I heard Neil Gray as the Cabinet Secretary say he would not respond to the legitimate concerns that had been raised and instruct a further pause.
“That was reiterated by the First Minister and I think this just shows they are unwilling to listen to business.
READ MORE: Time limit for questions in Scottish Parliament to be introduced
“They do not have all the answers and at times they have to step back and say: ‘We have got this wrong, a one-size-fits-all all policy is not the best.’”
He added: “I think I can put the SNP and the First Minister on notice that it’s the Scottish Conservatives’ intention to hold a debate on this issue and a vote to seek to stop the implementation on October 1 which is going to put businesses out of business.”
A recent report to Edinburgh City Council suggested up to 80% of short-term let properties – such as those on booking giant AirBnB – could be lost in the city.
Last week, Humza Yousaf (below) said there would not be a pause to the scheme.
Asked again on Monday if he would consider an extension at an event at the Riverside Museum in Glasgow, the FM said: “There will not be another extension to the deadline.
“It is the right thing to do to bring this licensing scheme in.”
However, he acknowledged the concern from the sector, adding: “We continue to work with the sector, in fact, Cabinet Secretary Neil Gray met with the sector, I think it was just last week.
“We’ll continue to engage with the sector where we can but there’ll be no more extensions.”
Industry pressure to delay the scheme has been growing as the deadline grows closer, with the owner of short-term let agency Dickins, which rents out dozens of properties in Edinburgh, claiming it would make Scotland a “laughing stock around the world” and end the Edinburgh Fringe festival.
READ MORE: Ex-Labour MP in damning verdict on Keir Starmer after latest U-turn
However, we told how a number of similar schemes have been introduced in numerous cities across Europe to tackle a housing crisis caused by a rise in short-term lets.
Barcelona introduced a licensing scheme in 2016, with fines of up to €60,000 for those operating a short-term let illegally, reducing AirBnB properties by around 50%.
And, Kenneth Haar, a researcher for Corporate Europe Observatory, said that claims the scheme being introduced in Scotland would make the country a “laughing stock” were “ridiculous”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel