AFTER the revelation of plans to spend £8 million to hang a picture of King Charles in Scottish schools and public buildings, The National took to the streets of Glasgow to ask people for their opinions.
The consensus was pretty clear, with all those we spoke with thinking it wasn’t appropriate spending given the ongoing cost-of-living crisis.
One person said “we already know what he looks like”, while another said the money should be going to the NHS, education or combatting homelessness.
King Charles' so-called "sausage fingers" were also mentioned.
The portrait plans have been slammed by the SNP who are reportedly set to block the move, after the UK Government reportedly asked the Scottish Government for an “exhaustive” list of buildings that would qualify for a portrait.
First Minister Humza Yousaf said at an event in Glasgow on Monday: "I just think that it is not the appropriate use of public money from the UK Government, to demand that we spend time and effort giving them details of every single school, I think they asked for, so on and so forth."
Scottish Ministers have since responded formally to the Deputy Prime Minister’s request making clear that it would fall to UK officials to undertake work on portraits of the King.
Meanwhile, Donald Cameron, the Scottish Tories' constitution spokesperson, told The Telegraph that it would be "petty" if the plans were to be blocked.
He said: “It has always been entirely normal for schools, hospitals and government offices to have a picture of the monarch. And no one is being forced to take one, they’re simply being given the option.”
One of those we spoke with in Glasgow would seemingly disagree.
“Portraits in this day and age … we’re not living in the 1800s anymore,” he said incredulously.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel