SCOTTISH Labour only meet their financial obligations due to “financial assistance” from the UK Labour Party, newly published accounts reveal.
SNP president Michael Russell suggested that it showed Scottish Labour “do not exist” as a party in their own right.
The accounts published online by the Electoral Commission on Thursday showed that Scottish Labour’s total income dropped to £773,999 in 2022, down from £1,235,950 in 2021.
With spending last year amounting to £897,786, the party recorded a deficit before tax of £123,787.
Of note, in 2022, the Scottish Labour Party only made a “contribution” to nine employees' salary costs at a cost of £29,502, compared with 14 in 2021. All other staff costs were paid by the UK Labour Party.
It is unclear how many people work for Scottish Labour specifically, but 394 employees – both full-time and part-time – work for the Labour Party, including their “regional offices”, as of December 31, 2022.
Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar previously dismissed suggestions that Scottish Labour are not a party in their own right as a “conspiracy theory”.
We also previously reported that the party recently vacated the Glasgow offices (below) which have housed them for around a decade.
A party spokesperson said Scottish Labour were moving to bigger premises in the city and added the move was not motivated by cost considerations.
The annual filing also noted that Scottish Labour’s finances are only a "going concern" – an accounting term used when it is assumed an entity will meet its financial obligations when they become due – because of financial assistance from the UK Labour Party.
The accounts read: “In consideration of the available reserves as at 31 December 2022 and the budgeted results for the subsequent accounting period The Labour Party has confirmed that it will provide financial assistance to The Scottish Labour Party as required to allow The Scottish Labour Party to meet its liabilities as they fall due, for a period of at least twelve months from the date of signing of the financial statements.
“Based upon the undertaking of financial support outlined above the Treasurer has a reasonable expectation that the party has adequate resources to continue its activities for the foreseeable future. Accordingly, the Treasurer has adopted the going concern basis in preparing the financial statements.”
READ MORE: The Keir Starmer U-turn quiz - a Branch Office Updates special
Scottish Labour were contacted for comment, but did not respond.
When it comes to the other political parties, the Scottish Conservatives do not publish separate accounts to the main UK party.
The SNP, meanwhile, showed a deficit of £804,278, while the Scottish LibDems had a surplus of £291,287. The Scottish Greens had a deficit of £28,191, while Alba recorded a surplus of £17,425.
Scottish Labour deputy leader Dame Jackie Baillie said the accounts show “the SNP is a party in utter disarray”.
She added: “The financial chaos now engulfing the SNP goes to show how little the governing party can be trusted with Scotland’s finances.”
Russell (above) hit back at Baillie, saying: "If you live in a glass house, don’t throw stones.”
He added: “I think a great deal has been made of the accounts of a number of political parties, but the accounts do prove that the Scottish Labour Party doesn't exist. It is an offshoot of UK Labour and it can only exist because it is funded by UK Labour.
“If their staff costs are met by other people, then you really do have a Potemkin political party. It has no real substance to it.
"The other important thing is that the comparison to the SNP is like apples and pears. You're dealing with one party which is wholly funded in Scotland, entirely transparent with all the salary costs and everything else laid out.
“And you've got another one which Jackie Baillie and others go around talking about as if it's absolutely transparent. The more you go into the accounts, the more you realise she's not telling the truth."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel