SCOTLAND'S First Minister has written to the owners of a trio of crisis-hit Glasgow care homes in a bid to avert looming strike action.
Around 200 carers at Baillieston Care Home, Cardonald Care Home and Stobhill Care Home have overwhelmingly rejected a pay offer by new owners Silverline Care amid claims they have slashed overtime rates.
Now Humza Yousaf has stepped into the row and called on executives to get around the table to try and halt the walkouts, which would be the first at care homes anywhere Scotland.
The politician's intervention comes as GMB Scotland revealed on Tuesday morning that 98% of members who took part in an official ballot earlier this month across the three facilities have voted to strike amid allegations the firm is also attempting to derecognise the staff's trade union.
The homes, where 150 residents are cared for, were previously run by the Four Seasons group before being take over by Silverline Care earlier this year. It has subsequently passed their day-to-day operation on to the Minster Care Group.
Yousaf has written to Mahesh Patel, chief executive of Minster, while also paying tribute to the dedication of staff in the face of the continuing threat to their livelihoods.
His letter says: “Social care workers provide a vital service. Their work providing personal care and social support to residents is essential to the running of care homes that are rooted in compassion.”
The SNP Glasgow Pollok MSP, who took credit for averting threatened NHS strikes when health secretary, also voiced concern about the alleged move to derecognise the GMB.
He wrote: “My own relationship with trade unions has been positive and constructive.
“Even where there have been disagreements, my approach has been to always continue constructive dialogue to try and find a solution.
“I hope the firm can offer reassurances that this will be its approach going forward.”
Union bosses say workers’ pay and conditions should have been protected during the transfer of ownership under TUPE legislation but GMB Scotland organiser Kirsty Nimmon claims that new management have instead tried to drive down pay and conditions, as well as reneging on a previous pay deal.
She says the overwhelming support for strikes shows the anger that now exists among staff.
She said: “These people are desperately worried for the residents they care for, but also for their own families and their careers.
“The staff deserve clarity and reassurance but instead have been plunged into continuing uncertainty and chaos. It cannot and must not go on.
“They appreciate Humza Yousaf’s obvious appreciation of the job they do and only wish the company would show the same respect for their crucial efforts.
“It is time for this company to reassure staff, avert these strikes and bring to an end what has been a hugely worrying time for the workers and the residents.”
A spokesperson for Silverline said a new management team was put in place in June and at that time there had been an unresolved negotiation with GMB over pay rates.
They also say contingency plans will be actioned should strikes proceed at any of the three homes.
They added: "Silverline had met with the GMB with a view to agreeing terms that were realistic within the context of the homes' trading position, but the discussions ended in stalemate.
"Staff received a pay rise in line with the terms of the National Care Contracts and local market rates and the company was still open to having discussions with a view to reaching a sensible solution.
"In the event of industrial action, measures will be put in place to ensure the continuation of quality care at each of the three homes."
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article