THE co-leader of the Scottish Greens has claimed a critic of his party’s powersharing deal with the SNP is yet to “come to terms with the reality of the climate crisis”.
The Bute House Agreement, which saw the leaders of the Scottish Greens given ministerial office in the Scottish Government in exchange for shoring up the SNP’s position at Holyrood, has been criticised in recent months, with the chief rebel being former minister Fergus Ewing.
Ewing, who described the Greens as “wine bar revolutionaries” in one of his outspoken interventions, has urged the SNP to allow members to vote again on the deal which was struck by Nicola Sturgeon’s administration in 2021.
But speaking to Scotland On Sunday, Patrick Harvie said: “He represents a generation that simply hasn’t moved on and come to terms with the reality of what the climate emergency requires of us all collectively.”
READ MORE: Fergus Ewing calls for SNP vote on Scottish Greens Bute House Agreement
Ewing has been an outspoken critic of climate change policies seen as being Green-driven, including highly-protected marine areas and the deposit return scheme.
Harvie was initially asked about both Ewing and former SNP leadership contender Kate Forbes, but he described the latter as “bright and articulate” while “the other is not”.
The Greens co-leader also claimed that internal critics of the deal may be hampering the SNP’s fortunes in the polls, with a survey this week suggesting the party’s lead in Scotland in general election voting has shrunk to just four percentage points over Labour.
READ MORE: Fergus Ewing to keep SNP whip after branding party policy 'extremist'
Harvie said: “I think there are some in the SNP who need to go back and reflect on the experience of being a minority government in the last session, the toxicity of that, and recognise that the public respond well when politicians find common ground and look to co-operate and build consensus.
“Even looking at the SNP’s fortunes, people who are stirring up hostility within the SNP’s ranks, they should be asking themselves whether they have far more to do with the SNP’s polling numbers at the moment than any individual policy delivery.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel