DOUGLAS Ross has accused English junior doctors of politicising their demands for pay because they dislike the Tory UK Government.
The Scottish Tory leader told The Scotsman that he believed NHS staff south of the Border wanted to make their pay a “political issue”.
The MP and MSP was asked why the UK Government would not offer the same pay deal to junior doctors in England as had been accepted in Scotland.
READ MORE: Junior doctors accept record pay offer averting strike fears
Junior doctors and dentists from the British Medical Association (BMA) Scotland accepted a record pay offer on Wednesday.
They accepted a 12.4% pay increase, with a commitment to future year’s pay rising in line with inflation, averting the threat of strikes.
The agreement means that Scotland became the only part of the UK to avoid NHS strikes.
In England, junior doctors have been offered a 6% rise with an additional consolidated £1250 increase.
The UK Government described this as an “average increase of around 8.8%” but it has been rejected, with staff walking out over several days.
Speaking at a visit to businesses in Ayrshire, Ross claimed junior doctors in England had the chance to accept the same deal as Scottish doctors but rejected it.
He told The Scotsman: “We’ve actually seen when the junior doctor representatives in England were asked would they accept the very same deal that’s now been accepted, they said no.
"Because they want to make this a political issue against a Conservative government at a UK level rather than getting a deal that works for junior doctors and gets them back to work."
READ MORE: Ex-Scottish Labour chief: I can't argue for the Union like I used to
Ross (below) said that he believes junior doctors accepted that those campaigning for a pay rise had politicised the row.
He added: “They were asked distinctly would you accept the very same offer that has been made to Scottish junior doctors and they said no.
"Because they want to make this an issue against the government.
“That’s not me saying this, that’s an admission from their leadership.
"I’m not part of the negotiations through the UK Government but I know there have been a number of offers made, but even if that offer were made, the exact same as what’s been offered here in Scotland, they have said they would not accept it because they want to keep challenging the UK Government.”
The Scottish deal has never been formally offered to junior doctors in England.
The UK Government has repeatedly said the recent offer - several percent below the deal offered to Scottish doctors and without a commitment to increase pay in line with inflation - is the final offer.
Ross was also asked why Scottish Tory health spokesperson Sandesh Gulhane - who announced he had been selected to fight for a Westminster seat at the next General Election - was allowed to keep his frontbench role.
READ MORE: Angela Rayner rules out employment law devolution to Holyrood
Stephen Kerr, a rival to Ross for the party leadership, lost his role as education spokesperson when he was selected to fight for a Westminster seat earlier this year.
Ross said Gulhane (below) was “uniquely placed” to keep his role due to his job as a GP.
“I want to make sure we have that experience leading the fight from the Conservative benches, holding the SNP government to account on healthcare,” he said.
In a recent YouGov poll, the Scottish Tories were languishing behind on 15% of the vote, seven points down from their result in the 2021 Holyrood election.
The survey also suggested the party would lose almost half of its seats at the next Scottish Parliament election in 2026, dropping from 31 MSPs to 16.
Ross said he was “absolutely” the right man for the leadership position, and added he believed the Tories could increase their number of Scottish MPs at the next UK-wide ballot.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel