SCOTTISH Government plans to end closed seasons for male deer will allow for the year-round “indiscriminate killing” and their “uncontrolled slaughter”, a Conservative MSP has claimed.
Highlands and Islands MSP Edward Mountain has now launched a petition against plans put forward by the SNP and Greens to remove the statutory closed seasons on male deer.
The move is to be considered by members of the Scottish Parliament’s Rural Affairs Committee after MSPs return to Holyrood following the end of the summer recess.
Mountain insisted: “After 40 years of managing deer, I cannot support the Scottish Government’s proposals to remove the closed seasons on all male deer.
“Creating a permanent open season on culling male deer will not lead to good management but indiscriminate killing and, I fear, uncontrolled slaughter.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon: Scotland's 'outstanding' events give us optimism
“That’s why I have lodged a motion to annul this proposal at the Scottish Parliament and have also launched a petition calling on the Scottish Government to drop this idea.”
He claimed the current closed season, when culling is not generally permitted, is “serving Scotland well” and is “effective at protecting the welfare of the deer population”.
The deer population in Scotland has doubled to more than 1 million in the past 30 years, with many ecologists highlighting the impacts such abundance has on woodland regeneration.
However, Mountain said if there is a need to shoot deer during the closed season, the existing licensing scheme could allow for this where “culling is justified”.
He said: “Frankly, replacing the current measures with an open season is just excessive.
READ MORE: GERS: Kate Forbes calls out 'mistruths' from pro-UK think tank boss
“Managing and culling the deer population takes more than just shooting every male deer in sight. The Scottish Government needs to go back to the drawing board and be far more thoughtful in its approach in its aim to reduce the size of the national deer herd.
“I would prefer to see them put more boots on the ground and collaborate more with land managers, focusing their efforts on protecting the fit and healthy male deer.
“Reducing the national deer herd is about good management, not massacres.”
Last year, Forestry and Land Scotland awarded numerous multi-million pound contracts to in order to reduce the deer population by around a fifth.
Without any natural predators, that work necessitates the killing of around 200,000 deer.
READ MORE: Scottish Energy Secretary won't back 'stop Rosebank oil field' calls
Mike Daniels, head of policy at the John Muir Trust conservation charity, and deputy convener of the Link Deer Group, welcomed the Government proposals.
He said: “We commend the Scottish Government for facing up to the fact that sustainable deer management is fundamental to Scotland’s efforts to deal with the twin crises of biodiversity and climate change facing the country. Changing the stag season is fundamental to achieving this.
“This is not just a marginal problem. Deer damage is extensive across the 26,000 square kilometres of Scotland’s land which is devoted primarily to private deer stalking.
“The biggest barrier to environmental, economic and social progress across this vast area is the unsustainable density of our red deer population.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel