PETE Wishart has insisted the SNP must make every General Election going forward a de facto independence referendum until the UK Government engages with them.
First Minister Humza Yousaf said in June that a win for the SNP would be a mandate to apply further pressure for Scottish independence.
But that fell short of the de facto referendum strategy put forward by his predecessor Nicola Sturgeon in the wake of defeat at the Supreme Court, which ruled Holyrood could not hold an independence vote without Westminster’s permission.
Veteran MP Wishart has, however, said “flesh and bones” must be added to Yousaf’s pledge to “ensure it is credible”.
He has said that if more than 50% of Scots vote for an SNP manifesto, that will prove the country wants to leave the UK and the party should commence negotiations to make this happen.
READ MORE: GERS: Kate Forbes calls out 'mistruths' from pro-UK think tank boss
He added this should be the approach to every General Election from now on until the UK Government is prepared to agree a process to settle Scotland’s constitutional future.
In a piece for The National, Wishart said: “We have already decided that the next Westminster election will be an independence election in Scotland.
“What we have to do is add flesh to the bones of this intention. We have to ensure it is credible and is democratic to its core.
"We need to now say clearly that if 50+1% of the Scottish people vote for an SNP manifesto that proclaims that Scotland will become an independent country then we will secure our independence. That Scotland has voted to become an independent nation and we will commence the negotiations that would lead to Scotland leaving the UK.
“People will rightly ask what happens if the UK simply ignore the result of this de-facto referendum? In response, we acknowledge that this will almost certainly be the case, but that is not a matter for us.
“What they can’t ignore or take away is the fact that the Scottish people have voted for independence and that changes everything. We will have delivered a result that shows the majority of Scots want Scotland to be an independent nation. This would be a mandate to assert ourselves as a nation.
READ MORE: Alba accuse Global of 'censorship' over Rishi Sunak ad ban
“Every election we now contest will be a de facto referendum until the UK Government is prepared to agree a process to settle the question of Scotland’s constitutional future.”
Wishart – who has been an SNP MP since 2001 – has also criticised those in the movement who slated the extent the SNP went to try and secure the transfer of a Section 30 order and subsequently the right to hold a referendum without this.
He said the party cannot continue to go over “old ground” and must move forward with a new strategy, but he insisted they had to everything possible to secure the “gold standard” referendum.
“Let’s get one thing abundantly clear; an agreed referendum remains the best possible way to settle the issue of Scottish independence,” added Wishart.
“The Edinburgh Agreement remains an exemplar of two governments coming together to design a democratic, clear process that allows a full debate and an agreed conclusive outcome. It was absolutely right that we committed every sinew to try and ensure that once again.
“It was also right to disregard any other alternative that got in the way of trying to secure this ‘gold standard’ of democratic engagement. Our focus had to be on securing a referendum as it is the one thing that would achieve a clear result, that would be beyond legal doubt and pave by far the smoothest path to Scotland becoming an independent country.
“When it became clear the UK Government had no intention of agreeing to a referendum, it was absolutely right to try and determine a process designed by the Scottish Parliament. It was also right that we ensured that, before embarking upon that journey, we had the powers and legal authority to carry it out.
“There will be those who will tell us that we should have known this all along, that we should have had a Plan B. They are totally and utterly wrong. We had to fully exhaust this process.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel