SNP depute leader Keith Brown has indicated that he would support a debate on the Bute House Agreement between the SNP and Scottish Greens at his party’s upcoming conference.
Speaking to BBC Radio Scotland’s Good Morning Scotland programme on Tuesday, Brown added that he still strongly backs the deal.
He said: “The SNP has a process by which things can be considered and I support that process.
He added: “If people want to have that discussion, then if that gets on to the agenda then of course I would support that debate, but that is a process that has to be gone through.
“My own personal view is that we had a very comprehensive vote in favour of that Bute House Agreement and I remain very strongly in favour of that Bute House Agreement.
“But of course, if a motion comes forward and if it’s supported, then we should have that debate.”
READ MORE: SNP's Keith Brown hits out at BBC reporting on credit card row
An article in The Herald on Sunday suggested a number of backbench MSPs were unhappy with the current arrangement, with one MSP telling the newspaper the Greens were “killing us”.
A number of other high-profile figures have also spoken out, including former finance secretary Kate Forbes, who suggested the SNP should “check-in”with members about the content of the deal while MP Joanna Cherry has said she would like to see the agreement renegotiated.
Fergus Ewing (below), one of the most vocal critics of the deal, said that now is the right time for members to have their say.
He said the Scottish public “increasingly see the Scottish Greens as hard-left extremists” and that they are “seen as primarily responsible for a whole series of policy disasters over the last two years”.
Brown said Ewing’s characterisation of the Greens as “hard-left extremists” was “absurd”.
He added: “The SNP wouldn’t be in coalition with anyone described as extremists.”
In his appearance, Brown also condemned personal abuse that has been directed at politicians – including himself – throughout the debate surrounding the Gender Recognition Act.
He told the programme: “I have always tried to take a very straightforward approach and I’m not involved in abusing or calling anybody names in what I understand is a controversial issue.
“It was voted on by a vast majority of people in the Scottish Parliament and I stand by that vote.
“I do agree there should be no place for personal abuse. I have been subjected to abuse for my own views but I don’t agree it’s right to indulge in personal abuse. People should have the right to have their say without having to suffer that kind of personal abuse.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel