NATIONAL readers have delivered their verdict on whether or not the SNP should continue with the Bute House Agreement.
In an informal poll, we asked readers if the SNP should continue with the governing agreement with the majority of people saying “no”.
However, the results were tight. Of the 2625 people who voted, 53% said they did not think the agreement should continue while 47% said they believed it should.
It comes after MSP and former Scottish finance secretary Kate Forbes (below) called on her party to “check in” with members on whether or not the Bute House Agreement should continue.
She suggested that a ballot could take place at this year’s party conference as she became the third former Scottish Government minister to call for such action.
“I’m a democrat, so I’m always in favour of checking in with the people, checking in with members – and that’s the purpose of conference, to ensure that they are continuing to support certain policies”, she said.
“I think Government has a duty to its party, obviously, to ensure that we are delivering in a way that’s consistent with the membership’s interests.”
Forbes continued: “Now, the Bute House Agreement, for example, includes a commitment to HPMAs, and we’ve seen the Government shift from HPMAs.
“It includes a commitment to the Deposit Return Scheme, and we’ve seen a shift away from the Deposit Return Scheme.
READ MORE: Yes Orkney display projects that benefited from EU at County Show
“So I think just asking ideologically about an agreement is less important than asking what should be in that agreement. Cooperation should always characterise our politics.”
The co-operation agreement which was first signed in 2021.
Fergus Ewing and Alex Neil are among those to have said members should have a say when conference takes place in Aberdeen in October.
The Scottish Greens Party Council unanimously voted to support the election of Humza Yousaf as First Minister and to continue with the Bute House Agreement following his victory in the SNP leadership election win earlier this year.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel