JOANNA Cherry has revealed she threatened to take legal action against the SNP after some of her Westminster colleagues tried to prevent her from speaking at a conference of the LGB Alliance.
During an interview at the Edinburgh Fringe, the SNP MP told how she was invited to speak at the gender-critical charity’s conference a couple of years ago but was “harangued” by fellow MPs in the party who tried to stop her joining a panel of guests at the event.
She said that if they had prevented her from speaking she would’ve said to the party "see you in court”.
“A couple of years ago, when the LGB Alliance held their first conference I was invited to go on a panel of cross-party speakers and a number of my MP colleagues harangued me and tried to prevent me from speaking at the conference and demanded I have the whip removed if I spoke at the conference,” Cherry told the crowd at the New Town Theatre on Thursday.
READ MORE: Joanna Cherry dismisses claim she said Greens deal should be 'ripped up'
“I said I was determined to go ahead and that if the party tried to prevent me I would see them in court.
“I did go ahead and speak at the conference but protesting outside that conference was a straight female MP, protesting the right of lesbians to speak about lesbian rights. In 21st century Britain, I found that shocking.”
During the 70-minute interview Cherry claimed she had been a victim of “homophobia” within her party but the atmosphere within the Westminster SNP group had “palpably changed” under the leadership of Stephen Flynn.
In an intensive discussion about transgender issues, Cherry hit back at her colleague Mhairi Black who said on the same stage earlier this week that transgender people should not be the subject of “intellectual debate”.
Cherry said: “I disagree with Mhairi. I think it is the responsibility of those of us elected to legislate to engage with the detail of legislation and with the consequences of legislation.
“It seems to me that what happened at Holyrood [when the Gender Recognition Reform Bill was passed ] was that there was huge focus on advancing the rights of trans people to the detriment other people’s rights.
“Responsible parliamentarians should be able to understand nuance and should be able to understand that rights sometimes may rub against each other and sometimes rights conflict and sometimes we have to look at legislation very carefully and make sure there are not unintended consequences.
“I’m sure lots of people in favour of self-ID were well-intentioned but equally those of us who said ‘hang on a minute there are implications for women’s safety’, we also deserved to be heard and for our concerns to be taken on board and not be branded transphobes and bigots.”
Cherry added she believed the tide was turning in the debate around gender and sex, pointing to Labour’s U-turn on self-ID.
READ MORE: Nicola Sturgeon slams Scottish media for coverage of credit cards row
She said there were many of her colleagues with misgivings about self-ID but were “scared to speak out because they’ve seen what’s happened to me”.
In the build-up to the event, organisers The Stand briefly cancelled the show after staff said they felt uncomfortable working at the event because of Cherry’s views, before it was put back on again after Cherry threatened legal action.
Following the show, The Stand said in a statement: “We are glad to have delivered this show, one of our popular programme of In Conversation With events at our New Town venue.
"This has been a great Fringe so far and we'll continue to work hard to deliver the 1000 plus performances in our busy schedule.”
The SNP have been approached for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel