ANDREW Bowie made misleading claims about council tax rises while attacking the SNP that were “missing important context”, a fact-checking service has said.
The minister for nuclear and networks has been criticised by Full Fact for tweeting about incoming council tax hikes - without setting out that the rise does not apply to 99.5% of properties in Aberdeenshire.
The Scottish Tory MP for West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine made the claim on X, formerly known as Twitter, on July 26.
READ MORE: Mhairi Black: Trans people should not be made into intellectual debate
He wrote: “The SNP plan to increase Council Tax by £768.12 per year in Aberdeenshire!
“The ScotTories are the only Party standing up for the North East. Join us in telling the SNP to Scrap The Hike!”
Bowie’s claim that the council tax hike in Aberdeenshire will cost households almost £770 was found to be misleading as it “isn’t true for the majority of properties”, Full Fact reported.
“This increase would apply only to about 630 Band H properties,” the fact checking service said.
“But 99.5% of homes would see no increase or an increase up to £477.54 by 2026/27.”
“This is missing important context, as Mr Bowie fails to say that this increase has not yet been agreed and, if it is, it would only apply to a small proportion of homes in the area,” Full Fact added.
The Scottish Government is currently consulting on plans that would see council tax rises for Band H properties across Scotland, at an expected 22.5%.
READ MORE: 'Major breakthrough' in Jagtar Singh Johal case after court ruling
In Aberdeenshire, this would equate to an increase of £768.12, as Bowie stated, but would only apply to 631 properties - 0.5% of all dwellings in the council area.
Full Fact pointed out that Bowie’s tweet appeared to suggest this would apply to all properties within the council area, and noted that he omitted to include that the increased rate would come into force over three years.
The majority of properties in Aberdeenshire - an estimated 70,000 - are council tax bands A-D, and will not see an increase under the proposals.
Properties in bands E-G would see their council tax go up, but by less than the £770 figure quoted by Bowie.
Around 22,600 Band E properties would pay an additional £137.31 a year compared to current rates. For 17,500 Band F properties, this would be £283.04, and 11,400 Band G Homes would be charged £477.54 more.
“Data should be presented in a clear way by politicians in order to minimise the risk of it being misinterpreted or people being misled by a claim,” Full Fact said.
“The use of official information without appropriate context and caveats can damage public trust in both official information and politicians.”
READ MORE: Lee Anderson branded 'pound shop Enoch Powell' for anti-migrant call
The Scottish Conservatives have been contacted for comment.
We previously told how a Question Time audience member accused Bowie of taking the public “for idiots and mugs” after he refused to answer a straight question.
And in June, Bowie praised Scottish Secretary Alister Jack for doing an “impressive job” of blocking legislation passed by the Scottish Parliament after Scotland’s deposit return scheme was delayed until at least October 2025.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel