FRESH analysis has revealed the areas of Scotland worst hit by the benefit cap since it was brought in a decade ago.
Using data from the Department for Work and Pensions, the SNP found Glasgow is the worst hit local authority area with nearly 5000 households having had their housing benefit or Universal Credit cut due to the policy as of February 2023.
The cap limits the total amount in some benefits that working-age people can receive, even if their full entitlement would otherwise be higher.
The annual UK government benefit cap for Scotland is currently £14,753 for a single person and £20,200 for a family.
READ MORE: Scottish council leader claims Home Office wants asylum seeker barge in Glasgow
Analysis revealed Edinburgh to be the second-worst-hit area with 4183 households impacted, followed by Fife (1867), North Lanarkshire (1490), Aberdeen (1420) and South Lanarkshire (1280).
Overall, the benefit cap has left the poorest families in Scotland more than £70million worse off since 2013.
A total of 28,188 households in Scotland have seen their housing benefit or Universal Credit payments reduced as a result of the benefit cap, including 24,546 households with children.
The analysis shows that on average impacted families in Scotland lose £50 a month as a result of the benefit cap.
The SNP’s women and equalities spokesperson, Kirsten Oswald (below), said: "Damaging Tory and Labour Party policies are cutting the incomes of thousands of working families across Scotland, who are struggling to make ends meet with their squeezed wages in broken Brexit Britain.
"It's shameful that Sir Keir Starmer wants to continue imposing these cruel Tory cuts against Scotland's will - showing the pro-Brexit Labour Party is indistinguishable from the Tories.
"The SNP is the only party offering real opposition to Tory cuts - and a fairer society with independence. In contrast, Sunak and Starmer are making this Westminster-made cost of living crisis even worse by imposing Brexit and austerity cuts to household incomes.
"The Tory benefits cap must be scrapped. At the next election, voting SNP is the only way to secure independence, tackle the cost of living and escape Westminster control for good with independence."
The analysis additionally shows the rate of the benefit cap has fallen significantly behind inflation, meaning Scottish households subject to the cap are now significantly worse off in real terms than they were when the policy was first introduced.
READ MORE: UK home insurance rates rocket post-Brexit compared to EU countries
If the level of the cap had instead kept pace with CPI inflation, it would be £17,233 for a single person and £25,720 for a family.
It means single people in Scotland are £2,479 worse off a year, and families are £5520 worse off a year.
The SNP’s probe comes after Labour were forced to admit they would keep the Tory bedroom tax and two-child cap.
Last week, it emerged 2338 households in Rutherglen and Hamilton West – where a by-election will be taking place following the recall of Margaret Ferrier – have had their housing benefit cuts due to the bedroom tax.
The policy reduces the amount of Universal Credit (UC) or housing benefit paid out to claimants if they have a spare bedroom in a rented council or housing association property.
Figures obtained by the SNP have also shown 3990 households (54%) in receipt of Universal Credit or Child Tax Credits were not in receipt of financial support for at least one child in April 2023 due to the two-child cap.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here