SCOTTISH Labour’s by-election candidate in Rutherglen and Hamilton West has been challenged to “reject NHS privatisation” after being pictured alongside shadow health secretary Wes Streeting.
Streeting has repeatedly made clear that, if Labour win the next UK General Election, they would use private companies to tackle NHS waiting lists.
In a press release published on Friday, Labour said it has “committed to using private sector capacity to bring down NHS waiting lists in the short-term, as part of its national mission to build an NHS fit for the future, that is there when people need it, by training the next generation of NHS staff and modernising the health service”.
It comes after the UK Government announced 8 new private sector run diagnostic centres in the NHS in England as well as a relaxation of the rules governing the awarding of NHS contracts to private companies.
However, Labour claim that the Conservatives have not done enough to increase involvement of the private sector in the NHS – stating that its spare capacity could have allowed for the treatment of 331,000 more NHS patients since January 2022.
A fantastic day campaigning right across the constituency - from Burnbank to Burnside and everything in between.
— Michael Shanks (@mgshanks) August 4, 2023
Grateful to everyone who spoke to us and who is backing a #FreshStart with Labour - and to @wesstreeting @KatySClark @LabourMercedes @CMochan for joining us! pic.twitter.com/l9Twa0HPV2
Now, the party’s candidate in the Rutherglen and Hamilton West by-election, Michael Shanks, has been pressed by an SNP MP on whether he backs Labour’s embrace of increased privatisation of the NHS.
The SNP’s health spokesperson at Westminster, Martyn Day, said: "The damaging competition between the Tories and pro-Brexit Labour Party to lurch further to the right, and impose creeping privatisation of the NHS, has set alarm bells ringing in Scotland.
"Like the SNP, the overwhelming majority of people in Scotland are committed to the founding principles of the NHS - and want to see more funding from the UK government, instead of ever increasing private sector involvement.
"I would challenge Michael Shanks to reject this toxic race to the bottom on public services, which should be in public, not profit-driven private sector hands. He must distance himself from yet another damaging Tory-Labour Party policy.
READ MORE: Electoral Commission comment on whether Scottish Labour are a 'party'
"Does Mr Shanks agree that the UK government should increase NHS funding to the higher levels seen under the SNP in Scotland? And will he reject Sir Keir Starmer's policy of real-terms cuts to NHS pay, and instead back SNP calls for a UK government-funded real-terms increase?
"People in Rutherglen and Hamilton West want real change - not another Tory Blairite clone. At the upcoming by-election, SNP candidate Katy Loudon is the only candidate offering real change with independence and real support for Scotland's NHS."
The Socialist Health Organisation, which is affiliated with the Labour Party, has also criticised Streeting for his rejection of a real-terms pay increase for NHS staff, stating that it is “shameful” he did not stand shoulder to shoulder with health unions.
Scottish Labour have been contacted for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel