CREATING a legacy of active travel in Scotland following the UCI Cycling World Championships is a “necessity”, Patrick Harvie has said.
The Minister for Active Travel told The National that the “next generation will not thank us” if the Scottish Government doesn’t get the infrastructure right and future-proof city centres.
Speaking following a discussion on International Active Travel Policy in the Trades Hall in Glasgow on Friday, Harvie said that there was a “compelling story for transformational change” discussed by attendees.
READ MORE: Electoral Commission comment on whether Scottish Labour are a 'party'
The panel event included contributions from Karel van Oosterom, the ambassador of the Kingdom of Netherlands to the UK, Ida Bigum Nielsen, from the city of Copenhagen, and Lee Craigie, Scotland’s active travel commissioner, as well as Harvie.
Speaking about contributions from Oosterom and Nielsen, Harvie explained: “They had a really compelling story to tell about the transformational change that’s been achieved, what it looks like, what it feels like, and the way it's just become normalised and become bedded in.
“And the way that when you make that change, you see places that are thriving, bustling, lively, fun places to be.”
He added that it can sometimes be difficult to offer the public a “different vision” of how their community could be, and how embedding cycling, walking and other forms of active travel can still meet the needs of each community.
“It's a harder thing to do, but if we can paint that picture, if we can show the benefits that have been achieved in other places that have already made that change, I think many more people will see the opportunity to do it in Scotland.”
The Scottish Government is investing almost £4 million in direct legacy projects from the Cycling World Championships, taking place in Glasgow between August 3 and 13.
However, funding has been ramped up to record levels by ministers to almost £190m in 2023, with a commitment to invest £320m - or 10% - of the Scottish Government’s transport budget on active travel by 2024-25.
In 2017, the annual budget given to local authorities on active travel was only £39m each year.
READ MORE: Anas Sarwar told to urgently clarify Labour's position on heat pumps
The Scottish Greens MSP insisted that there was an “appetite” for active travel across Scotland, but that the approach had to involve national government, local government, and the voluntary sector that have previously plugged the gap but have plenty of expertise to share.
“I genuinely think we're in a moment of opportunity and I think we're in a moment of necessity for doing this stuff,” Harvie said.
“Whether it's online retail, whether it's Covid accelerating the way that's changed the way that we use cities, whether it's online working, remote working, all of these changes have shifted the way that we use space, the way that we use buildings.
“If we get this right, if we join the dots between active travel as transport policy, as emissions reduction, and as a health policy, along with the economic development, how are we changing the way we use our towns and our cities and our built environment?
“Then places like this will be thriving, places like this will be places that folk want to spend time and want to be in and where they spend time, many of them will spend some money as well, that will support the economy.
“If we don't do that, the next generation will not thank us for not reinventing the way that we use city centres.”
In Copenhagen, ranked as the world's best capital for cycling, residents cycle an estimated 1.44 million kilometres daily, with 49% of all trips to school or work taken by bike. This is up from 35% just a decade ago.
And, not only that, but 97% of Copenhagen residents are satisfied with the cycling conditions in the city, including in the long dark winters.
READ MORE: Scottish Government bid to postpone gender reform court hearing fails
“There's a huge opportunity to create that kind of positive vibrancy that you do see in places like Copenhagen or Amsterdam,” Harvie said.
“That you have places that are genuinely attractors of people's time and of people's creativity and of the way they spend their money.
“I think this is a moment where it's, it's not just possible, but it's more important than ever that we get this right.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel