THE Tories' candidate for the Rutherglen and Hamilton West by-election has been branded a “hypocrite” for his comments on gender reform just weeks after posing with an LGBT flag.
Thomas Kerr, the Tories group leader on Glasgow City Council, where they have two members, took part in a photo op during Pride Month with other members of the local authority outside of the city chambers.
Kerr was pictured smiling alongside a number of other councillors who were holding an LGBT Pride flag, and has previously written about his horror that a “small minority of the population are being weaponised” in a column for our sister paper the Glasgow Times.
READ MORE: Jeremy Vine panned for Scottish independence 'fired' comments
And, when the photograph celebrating Pride Month was posted on June 22, Kerr wrote: “Some things are bigger than politics ... this is it! #LoveIsLove.”
Kerr responded to the criticism by stating it did a "disservice" to supporters of LGBT equality and insisted he is an "unequivocal" supporter of gender reform, but had issues with the GRR Bill.
But, just days after being announced as the Tories' candidate for Rutherglen and Hamilton West, Kerr attacked Labour’s candidate Michael Shanks for backing self-ID and the Gender Recognition Reform Bill.
We previously told how the GRR legislation was blocked by the Scotland Office from being given Royal Assent, a move that is now subject to a legal challenge by the Scottish Government.
On Thursday, Kerr shared a screenshot of a Telegraph article with the headline: “Labour by-election candidate clashes with Keir Starmer on self-ID.
“Michael Shanks says he does not agree with the two-child benefit cap and backs the SNP’s gender self-ID Bill.”
Writing above the screenshot, Kerr said: “The SNP's Gender Reform Bill risks the safety of women across Scotland.
“Despite opposition from their own voters, Labour’s candidate in Rutherglen & Hamilton West backs this flawed bill.
READ MORE: Labour call for greater 'use of private sector' in NHS care
“If voters want an alternative to this cosy alliance, then @ScotTories are offering it.”
Scottish Labour's Keiran O’Neill, a councillor for Maryhill, wrote: “It wasn’t that long ago Thomas stood in solidarity (quite literally) with LGBT+ people… now he is just doing gutter politics because the Tories literally have nothing positive to say. So disappointing.”
Mhairi Hunter, former Glasgow SNP councillor, added: “What a difference being selected as a by-election candidate makes…”
National columnist Ellie Gomersall weighed in, sharing the picture of Kerr and his fellow councillors with the Pride flag, adding: “It takes some brass neck to pose for a photo op for pride then just weeks later spread transphobic lies as soon as you're selected as a by-election candidate.”
“This you? Being a hypocrite. Well I guess talking through your ass is par for the course for Tories,” wrote Heather Herbert, a Scottish Greens member.
“Thomas has been a rare Tory willing to stick his neck out and defend LGBT+ rights, which takes guts in a place as hostile to that as the Tories,” one social media user said.
“If he’s willing to drop it the moment he’s selected for a Westminster by-election, then he was never a friend of the LGBT+ community/ Another said simply: “Thought you were better than this. Sad.”
READ MORE: SNP MP welcomes home constituents after 'difficult journey' from Sudan
In response to the claims, Kerr said: “The responses sent to me by Councillor O’Neill, among others, do a disservice to supporters of LGBT + equality, of which I am most certainly one.
“Using inflammatory language, as he does, is deeply unhelpful when the debate around this issue is already toxic enough.
“Those taking issue with my post know that I am an unequivocal supporter of gender reform. Raising concerns over the SNP’s flawed bill doesn’t change that commitment.
“Voters across Scotland – including many who typically back Labour and the SNP – are opposed to this bill and I believe my view pragmatically reflects those concerns, while wholeheartedly remaining a proud ally of our LGBT + community.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel