FERGUS Ewing has called for SNP members to be allowed a fresh vote on whether to continue working with the Scottish Greens.
It comes after the Greens’ first UK parliamentarian Robin Harper announced his resignation from the party in a letter to Patrick Harvie, stating they had “lost the plot” with the approach to Scottish independence and trans rights.
In August 2021, members of both the SNP and the Scottish Greens voted overwhelmingly to accept the terms of a cooperation agreement which saw the Greens backing the SNP minority Scottish Government on the bulk of its policies.
Ewing, who sat as an MSP alongside Harper, has said the departure from the Greens should “send a message” to First Minister Humza Yousaf about the dangers of working with them.
READ MORE: Greens' Patrick Harvie hits out at Robin Harper in leaked message
Calling for a new ballot for SNP members to decide whether or not to continue the Bute House Agreement, Ewing said: “His main charge, which is that his party has become a party of extremists, is spot on.
“The relationship that we had with the Green Party was supported, yes, by an overwhelming majority of our members in 2021, but that was before it was put into practice and before anyone realised the full enormity of dealing with these extremists.
“Perhaps now is the time to re-ballot SNP members.
“I suspect the result would be very different.”
Research by Panelbase for The Times in April found 53% of voters backed the cooperation deal, which gives the Greens two junior ministerial posts in Government.
Across all parties, Panelbase found 33% backed the deal, with 43% opposed and 21% unsure.
The Scottish Greens Party Council unanimously voted to support the election of Yousaf as First Minister and to continue the Bute House Agreement following his leadership election win earlier this year.
In one of his first actions following his selection by members, Yousaf met with the Scottish Greens co-leaders and reaffirmed his commitment to the Bute House Agreement.
Ewing, the former SNP rural affairs secretary, previously called for the end of the power-sharing agreement and dubbed the Greens “wine bar pseudo-intellectuals”.
READ MORE: Most SNP voters back Bute House Agreement with Greens, says poll
He wrote in the Scottish Daily Mail in April: "We’ve allied ourselves to a small group of fringe extremists that want to dismantle our economy, put hundreds of thousands on the dole and basically close down rural Scotland."
At the time, Scottish Greens MSP Ross Greer said Ewing was "indistinguishable" from the Tories on most issues and "clearly despises" progressive governing.
Jamie Hepburn, Minister for Independece, said last week that the deal would remain in place – despite warnings from Ewing about its impact on a referendum.
Ewing said in a podcast he did not believe independence supporters could win a referendum if one was held in the next few years, because of “extremist” policies, such as gender self-identification, HPMAs and the deposit return scheme.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel