THE Scottish Greens have condemned plans for a "luxury playground for the mega-rich" on the banks of Loch Tay.
Instead, Kenmore’s residents need homes, added Mark Ruskell.
The Green MSP's comments come following a public meeting held in Aberfeldy on the evening of the 27th July for people to share their concerns about overdevelopment at Loch Tay, with over 300 people attending
Local residents and neighbours are increasingly concerned about an ever-expending development project in Loch Tay, centered around Taymouth Castle – which was first reported by The National in May.
Overseas mega-property developers, US-based Discovery Land Company (DLC), are now in possession of a huge swathe of land and property on the loch – prompting serious concerns from locals about their community turning into a billionaire’s playground, as well as harmful impact on biodiversity and access.
The US firm owns more than 30 similar compounds across the globe, with access limited to members – who must purchase a property within its walls (prices vary from $3 million to $50m) and pay an annual fee (typically between $37,500 and $300,000).
A recent planning application put in by DLC for further work, alongside disruption to the core path networks due to building work, has aggravated concerns.
READ MORE: SNP figures weigh in on plans for DLC 'playground' at Taymouth Castle
Ruskell has met with campaigners from the Protect Loch Tay group, and reached out to DLC for an urgent meeting to discuss concerns.
Ruskell said: “Folks across Kenmore and surrounding villages are rightly concerned about the impact of this mega overdevelopment on the community.
“We don’t need a luxury playground for the mega-rich on the banks of Loch Tay. We need to be investing in assets for the local community, not carving off land for fancy private clubs for millionaires.
"What may have been appropriate in the 19th century is not appropriate in the 21st century. The developers are going to face a huge battle unless they can change their plans and offer legally binding agreements to protect the public interest.
“Further development on this site also threatens to damage the unique biodiversity of Loch Tay, from disturbing the habitats of otters to damaging mature woodlands.
“Things have gone too far. It’s time for Discovery Land Company to halt further any further planning applications, and if they won’t, for Perth and Kinross Council to finally stand up to the developers and refuse further consents.
"There is no accountable masterplan for the project that has been shared with the community to be scrutinised. The plethora of planning applications have meant that it is hard to hold developers to account. Each further planning application is going to face a massive battle unless the developers can change tack and fully address concerns.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel