LABOUR have been urged to bring back the funding of the monarchy under democratic control – after it was revealed the Government would give King Charles a 45% pay rise.
Changes to how the monarchy is funded were brought in by the Conservative Government led by David Cameron and recently resulted in the King preparing for a bumper payment of the Sovereign Grant of £125 million in 2025.
Internal pressure group Labour for a Republic has written to Keir Starmer and his shadow chancellor Rachel Reeves to demand the party reverse the Tory policy.
Nick Wall, the group’s chair, wrote: “David Cameron and George Osborne did a great deal of harm to the UK economy, not least by ensuring those who had the most benefitted at the expense of those who had the least. It falls to the next Labour government to put things right.
READ MORE: Scottish Government to pay for 'second' coronation - plus £22k sword
“One of their Tory ‘reforms’ included the introduction of the Sovereign Grant, moving decisions on the funding of the monarchy from the control of MPs to a group of three – the Prime Minister, Chancellor and Keeper of the Privy Purse.
“As a result, we have seen dramatically increased funding to one of the richest families in the country at the expense of taxpayers.
“In 2025 the King will receive an eye-watering 45% rise. This is at a time when nurses are receiving 5% and other key public workers are still fighting for a fair wage.
“We believe that this award is morally unjustifiable, while also both anti-democratic and plain wrong.
“The people of this country should have their say on royal funding through debate between their elected representatives.
“A £39m increase in royal funding (or for that matter, £250m for an unnecessary coronation or Charles’s £500m unpaid inheritance tax bill) may seem small to some, in the context of the Tory’s disastrous economic legacy, but it is still an important issue, as it is incumbent on those at the top to set an example – too often the monarchy is an exception to the rules that the rest of us have to follow.
“Thus, we urge you to revisit how the sovereign grant is calculated and restore MPs’ oversight of the process.”
The Labour Party were approached for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel