POLICE Scotland has found itself at the centre of a storm around “male violence against women” after the victim of an assault at a gender critical protest saw the perpetrator let off with a warning.
It comes after the Women Won’t Wheesht (WWW) group held an event calling for trans women to be barred from women’s sports in Aberdeen’s Duthie Park on Sunday.
At the demonstration, Julie Marshall said she was punched in the arm and head by a counter-protester who had taken one of the WWW signs.
READ MORE: Crown Office confirm Police have not reported any cases for prosecution in SNP probe
On Monday, police told The National that officers in attendance at the organised protest were “made aware of an assault of a 54-year-old woman during the event and an individual, aged 26, has received a recorded police warning in connection with the incident”.
Gender critical campaigners For Women Scotland and Murray Blackburn Mackenzie, a policy analysis group with a focus on sex and gender, both wrote to Police Scotland’s outgoing chief constable raising their concerns about the handling of the assault.
We have written today to Iain Livingstone, Chief Constable of Police Scotland, following events in Aberdeen last weekend. @forwomenscot pic.twitter.com/7TGd9ttoRU
— MurrayBlackburnMackenzie (@mbmpolicy) July 26, 2023
Murray Blackburn Mackenzie asked police chief Iain Livingstone if officers had assessed their obligations in protecting a person’s right to “freedom of peaceful assembly” when issuing the warning.
And For Women Scotland asked if the “decision not to prosecute the assailant can be revisited”.
Marshall told the Herald she was “really, really angry” about the police’s handling of the assault, claiming: “They're just saying you can punch these women that you don't agree with and steal their property with impunity.”
Responding to the concerns raised by the gender critical campaigners, Police Scotland said they had acted “in line with the Lord Advocate’s guidelines”, which are not public.
READ MORE: Joanna Cherry: It should be obvious who pays for Scotland's green transition
A spokesperson said: “As a result of an allegation of assault at the WWW rally on Sunday, a male suspect was identified and received a recorded police warning, which is in line with the Lord Advocate’s guidelines.
“Correspondence has been received by Police Scotland in relation to the outcome of this incident which is being assessed and will be responded to in due course."
Writing on Twitter, SNP MP and KC Joanna Cherry, herself a prominent gender critical campaigner, said that the concerns about the police conduct were “well placed”.
She went on: “Male violence against women should always be taken seriously even more so when it’s done to prevent women exercising their rights to freedom of expression and freedom of assembly.”
At the protest, the WWW group represented the "gender critical" side of the debate around gender reform. They believe that someone's sex is immutable and as such transgender people should be barred from women's only sports and spaces.
A counter-protest of trans rights advocates saw demonstrators hold signs suggesting that WWW were wrong to focus on attacking trans people's right to exist rather than women's rights issues such as the gender pay gap or domestic violence.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel