LABOUR will head into the second day of its national policy forum facing reports of rows and union walkouts over its child benefit cap stance and on workers’ rights.
Keir Starmer has warned the forum, which on Sunday will continue to consider ideas that could make it into the general election manifesto, the party cannot commit to unfunded spending pledges.
The leader has urged members, trade unions and other affiliated groups taking part in the talks in Nottingham not to “pile” Labour up with “baggage” that could stand in the way of it forming the next government.
There were several reports on Saturday a row had developed over workers’ rights causing union members to walkout, including over a push to set the national living wage at £15 per hour, a move said to be backed by Unison.
One report said: "Understand Unite and GMB unions have walked out at Labour NPF after 'hostile negotiations' on workers' rights."
The Sunday Times said unions were likely to put forward an amendment designed to force a change of policy over the two-child limit to child benefit.
READ MORE: Mercedes Villalba: This is why I have spoken out in direct opposition to Keir Starmer
However, Starmer has said Labour will keep the cap, which was introduced by Tory former chancellor George Osborne during his austerity drive.
It prevents parents from claiming Universal Credit for any third or subsequent child.
Campaigners say scrapping the cap would lift around 270,000 households with children out of poverty at an estimated cost of £1.4 billion in the first year.
The likes of Unison, the UK’s biggest trade union, the Fire Brigades Union, the Communication and Workers Union (CWU) and train drivers union Aslef are preparing to test the leadership’s resolve on the issue, according to The Sunday Times.
But Starmer seemed unmoved under questioning on Saturday.
He told broadcasters during a visit to Shefford, Bedfordshire, the priority for his premiership would be to fix a “broken economy” and “broken public services”.
“That is why I’ve been absolutely clear that we won’t have any unfunded spending commitments, so we proceed on that basis,” Starmer said.
“And that is why we’re not going to change our policy on the two-child benefit cap.”
It is expected senior figures will look to talk down any attempt to bring controversial matters to a vote at the forum on Sunday.
There is the possibility that some testing matters could be knocked-on for discussion at the party’s autumn conference in Liverpool but officials are keen to avoid a show of division at such a public forum.
READ MORE: People must know the next election is about independence
The BBC reported there will be wording in the agreed policy documents at the Nottingham forum which will state that Labour’s fiscal rules are “non-negotiable”, giving shadow chancellor Rachel Reeves a get-out clause on any pledges she does not like.
Addressing the forum on Saturday, Starmer said the party needed to show “historic levels of effort, discipline and focus” ahead of a likely election next year.
“We’ve got to ask ourselves seriously – are our priorities the priorities of working people?” he said
“Or are they just baggage that shows them we don’t see the country through their eyes?”
He added: “‘Tough choices’ is not a soundbite. It is the day-to-day reality we will face if we win power – clearing up their [the Tories’] mess.”
Labour said it would not be commenting on the forum, saying it was a private meeting.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel