A MAJOR milestone has been reached in the petition calling for former Scottish Tory leader and peer Ruth Davidson to be removed from the board of Scottish Rugby.
The appointment of Davidson as a non-executive director earlier this month sparked outrage among fans with some insisting they would boycott games until she was removed from her post.
Others have said they won’t buy the new Scottish Rugby World Cup kit unless she is replaced, while some have gone as far as to suggest they will switch their allegiance to other countries they have links to.
Scottish Rugby claimed she would bring a “depth of experience” to the board.
Now the petition – started by fan Scott McCarthy – has now attracted almost 13,100 signatures.
READ MORE: Scottish councillor let off after 'Tories want to kill people' claim
It says the appointment of Davidson – who was made a life peer in the House of Lords in 2021 – raises concerns regarding conflicts of interest as she holds “strong political biases” that may influence decision-making.
The petition argues her “lack of experience” in terms of rugby administration or management makes her unsuitable for the role, while fans have cast doubt on whether she will dedicate sufficient time to the role given she has taken up several high-profile roles outside of politics.
It goes on: “The presence of a politically polarising figure like Ruth Davidson within the SRU can lead to public skepticism about its independence from external influences or agendas unrelated to rugby development itself.
“Maintaining transparency in sports governance is paramount for maintaining public trust and support.
“We urge the Scottish Rugby Union to prioritise the best interests of Scottish Rugby by removing Ruth Davidson from her position as non-executive director.
“By doing so, the SRU can demonstrate its commitment to impartiality, expertise, and inclusivity within its governance structure.”
Recent comments on the petition say the move is a “step backwards” as rugby union continues to try and rid itself of the stereotype of being an upper class, public school sport.
Others have criticised the appointment of the Baroness of Lundin Links as she “does not reflect the values of Scottish people” and has “never acted in Scotland’s best interests”.
The SRU has so far declined to offer further comment on the response to Davidson’s appointment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel