PLANS to increase miniumum unit pricing (MUP) to 80p have been put forward by the Scottish Government.
In a consultation document sent to the alcohol industry, there are options of raising the current rate of 50p per unit, with the survey asking firms how such a move could impact business.
Campaigners have been calling for MUP - which has been in place since 2018 - to be uprated in line with inflation for quite some time amid concerns its effect could be swallowed up by rising prices.
It means a bottle of whisky could rise by £8, while a six pack of Tennent's could end up costing just under £10.
The survey does also explore the option of decreasing the current rate and keeping it at the same level, while there are options for 60p and 70p rates.
READ MORE: Two-child benefit cap hit 80,000 Scottish kids in 12 months
The Federation of Independent Retailers said an MUP of 80p is “over the top”.
Hussan Lal, the group’s president in Scotland, said: “This could price out those who look forward to a beer or a glass of wine.
“It would be particularly hard when family budgets are already badly squeezed by the cost of living crisis.
"We welcome any reduction in harmful levels of drinking. It undoubtedly blights many lives.”
But Scottish Health Action on Alcohol Problems (SHAAP) has said the effectiveness of MUP will not last unless it is uprated.
Dr Alastair MacGilchrist, chair of expert clinician partnership at SHAAP, said: “Minimum unit pricing has achieved its intended effect of reducing alcohol consumption and harms. This has been evidenced by the Public Health Scotland final evaluation, which was published last month.
“However, as long as the level remains fixed at 50p (the level proposed when approved by Parliament 11 years ago and unchanged since it came into effect in 2018), the effectiveness of MUP is being continuously eroded by inflation, currently running at 8.7%.
“The original modelling by Sheffield University, on which MUP was based, indicated that a higher price would save significantly more lives and prevent more hospital admissions.
“In order to maintain MUP’s life-saving effect, it is essential that MUP is uprated. Based on inflation, 50p in 2018 was equivalent to 62p in May 2023.
“SHAAP are calling for an uprating of MUP to at least 65p when the Scottish Parliament decides this matter next year.”
READ MORE: Labour can't say if they'll get rid of Bedroom Tax
The Scottish Government said the responses from the consultation will inform its review of MUP later this year.
In June, a report found that since its introduction alcohol deaths were down by more than 13%.
A Scottish Government spokesperson said: “These surveys are part of the Scottish Government’s ongoing work to review the operation and effect of MUP at the current price of 50 pence per unit and will help inform a potential future level of MUP, should evidence support its continuation.
“The Scottish Government’s final report will be laid in Parliament later this year.
“Recent research published in the Lancet by Public Health Scotland and Glasgow University estimated that around 150 alcohol attributable deaths and 400 alcohol attributable hospital admissions each year have been averted since the policy was introduced, with the largest reductions in our most deprived areas.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel