RESIDENTS of a Clydebank street have raised concerns after plans were unveiled to build what’s claimed to be "Europe’s largest battery storage site" next to their homes.
Those living on Cochno Road have vowed to fight the proposals to develop a 560MW battery storage facility, comprising 29 hectares of land on greenbelt fields behind Faifley.
Developers say the battery facility would be capable of storing and releasing enough energy to power approximately 165,000 homes and save 240,000 tonnes of carbon annually.
It would comprise a number of containerised units to house battery energy storage systems and associated ancillary infrastructure.
Each container will have the appearance of a standard metal ISO/shipping container and soundproofing measures will be implemented.
It is understood the plans won't go before the council or a local planning committee, instead, they will be considered by the Scottish Government’s Energy Consents Unit.
Although the land earmarked for the development sits in East Dunbartonshire, it is claimed those living in West Dunbartonshire will be the ones directly affected.
Locals were only made aware of the proposals when they received a letter from a company called AAH Consultants inviting them to two days of three-hour-long consultation events at Skypoint.
READ MORE: Hunterston and Kincardine give huge boost to Scotland's net-zero journey
However, Labour Provost Douglas McAllister attacked the way these consultations had been promoted - claiming only a handful of residents received the letters.
He told the Clydebank Post: “The development proposal would affect my constituents in Faifley, rather than residents of East Dunbartonshire.
“I immediately contacted Pamela Clifford, the head of the planning authority at West Dunbartonshire Council to insist that we express our concerns and make representation on behalf of the residents of Faifley and Hardgate.
“I understand that the company has arranged for two public consultation meetings in the Skypoint Centre in Faifley.
“However, I also understand that they issued only six letters to residents of Cochno Road and therefore, in my opinion, it is unlikely that the residents of Faifley and Hardgate will be aware of this development or the public consultation exercise.”
The Provost’s concerns echo that of Cochno Road residents, who worry about the battery facility’s impact on the local wildlife and the value of their homes.
James Johnston, whose mother-in-law lives on Cochno Road, believes the plans contradict what they have been told in the past about building on the greenbelt area.
He said: “The nature of the properties there, they are rural in their aspect.
“It’s not a housing development, there is only a handful of properties there.
“And, whenever anyone who lives there has applied for planning permission to do any development, they have really struggled because it is greenbelt land.
“To put an extension on your house or build a big shed in the garden, there are actual constraints on that, so to then turn around and say they are going to develop this huge site, it’s not on.
“The actual scale of what they are proposing is frightening.”
Before adding: “I think the consensus amongst all the neighbours I have spoken to is definitely one of anger.
“It doesn’t seem to be in line with what the area is.”
Violet Forbes, who lives with her mum and dad on the street, added her dismay at the project.
She said: “It’s a massive place up here. It’s so busy for walkers. There’s the Kilpatrick Hills.
“So, all of the paths which lead through the fields take you up to the hills. It’s just very popular for people, not just from Clydebank but from all over Scotland, who come up here and go walks because of all the different routes that they can go.
“All of that will be taken away.”
The consultants run by AAH Consultants will take place across two dates, starting on Tuesday, July 18 and then on August 1.
Each day will have two sessions, one from 11am to 2pm and then another from 4pm to 7pm.
They will be held at Skypoint (Lennox Drive, Faifley, G81 5JY).
AAH Consultants have been approached for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel