THE road to Hell is, as the saying goes, paved with good intentions. There’s no doubt that Thrown – the new play for the National Theatre of Scotland by Nat McCleary – has its political heart in the right place. Unfortunately, as a work of theatre, it is nothing short of a disaster.
The play is set in the world of Scottish backhold wrestling. It finds three young women (Imogen, Jo and Chantelle) and one older woman (Helen) being coached for Highland Games competitions by Pamela (a devotee of New Age ideas who, in the course of the drama, begins a difficult transition from female to non-binary identity).
The sporting scenario is, alas, no more than a lightly sketched metaphor for the real subject, which is the vexed and topical subject of personal and social identity. The most significant wrestling being undertaken by each of the (sadly, two-dimensional) characters is, not with their fellow athletes, but with issues of identity (ID) politics.
Imogen, for instance, is a wealthy, black Londoner of Scottish birth, while Jo is a “mixed-race” Gaelic-speaker. Chantelle is white and working-class, as is Helen (who is bemused and, at times, upset by the identity conflicts that break out among her younger colleagues).
READ MORE: BBC suspends staff member after explicit photo claims about presenter
By the time McCleary has established the characters’ various identities and related disputes we find that the play has engaged itself in a considerable array of weighty socio-political matters, including: race, gender, gender identification, class, national identity, online culture, generational distinctions and sexual orientation. The problem with this is that it descends quickly into a schematic, quasi-sociological exploration of current debates around “intersectionality” and “privilege theory”.
All of this leaves the show’s director Johnny McKnight precious little room for theatrical subtlety or nuance. There are a few carefully choreographed bouts of backhold wrestling, some histrionic arguments and very occasional flashes of nice writing (such as a joke about Helen wrestling a 12-year-old), but the overwhelming sense remains that of a heavy-handed political treatise.
No blame attaches to the talented, five-strong cast, who make a surprisingly decent fist of such unrewarding material. Questions have to be asked, however, about how this piece – which may well be the worst in the NTS’s 17-year history – managed to make it through the selection processes of Scotland’s national theatre company.
READ MORE: The lessons of 2014 must continue to inform the Yes movement
It is, surely, the least we can expect of NTS artistic director Jackie Wylie and her team that – in their quest to present work that speaks to Scotland and the world in the 21st century – they prefer poetics to polemics. ID politics may seem to be very much of the socio-political zeitgeist, but – from Sophocles’s Oedipus Rex, through Shakespeare’s Coriolanus to Lorraine Hansberry’s 20th-century classic A Raisin in the Sun – great theatre has always addressed matters of human identity.
It has done so, however, by expressing those identities through complex and universal human experience. Had it done so, as McCleary does here, through bald explication and point making, the narrative play would have died in Greece more than 2500 years ago.
Touring until August 27: nationaltheatrescotland.com
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here