A TORY minister was slammed by an audience member for a bizarre performance on Question Time on Thursday night.
During a debate about whether social media was a good way to discuss politics, the veterans minister accused social media users of “collective bed-wetting” after he faced criticism for suggesting that food bank use was a choice.
This led to one audience member shutting him down at the end of the show, saying: “Given that members of the Conservatives and the Conservative party have shut down any form of meaningful protest, and he’s shouted across every member of this panel tonight – how else are we meant to get our point across other than social media?”
Minister Johnny Mercer complains about people being outraged on social media - or as he puts it "collective bed-wetting".
— Best for Britain (@BestForBritain) July 6, 2023
Lady from the audience cuts him down to size with ONE SENTENCE. 👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽 ~AA #BBCQT pic.twitter.com/fS8KmBzxXf
It topped off a bizarre performance from Mercer, who repeatedly clashed with Labour frontbencher Bridget Philipson and had to be told off by Fiona Bruce for wrongly suggesting the Labour Party was funded by climate group Just Stop Oil.
“Facts matter,” she told him.
The MP for Plymouth Moor View was condemned on social media.
“An almost unbelievably appalling performance from Mercer this evening,” said Liam Thorp, the political editor for the Liverpool Echo.
Career ending childish galootery from Johnny Mercer…
— Stuzi 🐝🐝 (@stuzi_pants) July 6, 2023
Really really distasteful behaviour from a man who’s a perfect illustration of a political party that’s given up but is perfectly happy to go down in flames and in shame. Really poor #bbcqt
pic.twitter.com/PMyhMVAg8b
Another user said: “Career ending childish galootery from Johnny Mercer.
“Really really distasteful behaviour from a man who’s a perfect illustration of a political party that’s given up but is perfectly happy to go down in flames and in shame. Really poor.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel