A FORMER Inverclyde councillor charged with abusive behaviour and criminal damage was threatened with a hammer during the alleged incident, a trial has heard.
Ex-SNP group leader, Chris McEleny - now general secretary of the Alba Party - is facing two charges regarding an alleged disturbance in Greenock.
McEleny, 36, denies shouting, swearing and repeatedly kicking and banging a door at an address on Kelly Street.
His alleged victim told the sheriff court that the former councillor was "definitely drunk" when he turned up at his home in the early hours of the morning and started "banging" on his door.
The man said he felt threatened after McEleny "kicked" his top floor flat door "with force", leaving a footprint mark on it.
He added: "I keep my tools at the front of my flat and I grabbed a hammer then opened the door.
"I just assumed he wasn't going to stop.
"He saw what I had in my hand and he started backing off and I shouted at him to get out of the close.
"I was quite shaken by this so I phoned police."
McEleny is said to have acted aggressively towards the man whilst allegedly making threats to force entry.
He is further charged with maliciously forcing the door and causing damage to its handle during the alleged incident on September 26, 2021.
The householder said McEleny had stated that he could "phone people to come round and put my door in".
The politician left the building but was spotted staring up at the man's flat windows before returning inside later, it is claimed.
The court heard that a neighbour who had heard the commotion at around 2am then came upstairs and escorted McEleny outside.
Defence advocate Joseph Barr, instructed by solicitor Gerry Keenan, put it to the witness that there were discrepancies between his evidence given in court and the statement he gave to police, claiming he was in fact "the aggressor" in the situation and "advanced towards the accused with the hammer".
Mr Barr asked him: "You were posing a threat to the accused, is that true?"
The witness replied: "No, I was defending myself.
"It was more of a deterrent, I would say."
Advocate Barr claimed the man's police statement "does not square up" with his account of events in court.
The trial also heard evidence from the downstairs neighbour, who claimed McEleny had been "aggressive and threatening" but "calmed down" after he was spoken to.
The witness, who told the court he had briefly been an SNP member, denied leaking details of the incident to the press before any court hearings had taken place.
He also said he complained to Inverclyde Council and McEleny, seeking reparation for the alleged damage caused to the door handle on the front of the building, but refuted a suggestion that he was trying to make a "political point" by raising the matter.
The trial is scheduled to continue before Sheriff Morag Fraser in September.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article