A HISTORIAN has accused Labour of contributing to Scotland’s “amnesia around slavery”, saying the party should not try to “politicise” the country’s reckoning with its imperial history.
The row broke out after the Scottish Labour branch in Rutherglen criticised Mhairi Black’s speech at the SNP independence convention on Saturday.
Black invoked the history of Commonwealth countries who declared their independence from the UK, saying that of the 62 who had done so since 1939 “not a single one has ever asked to come back”.
Labour’s Rutherglen branch responded: “Implying that Scotland is a colony is an insult to those who suffered at the hands of the British Empire.
“Scotland was not an innocent by-stander here; it was significantly involved and reaped the rewards.
SNP local administrations have contributed to Scotland’s imperial reckoning with two slavery investigations (Glasgow and Edinburgh).
— Glasgow Sugar Aristocracy (@glasgow_sugar) June 25, 2023
The Labour Party contributed to Scotland’s amnesia around slavery, naming ‘The Merchant City’ in 1990.
I’d sit this one out. https://t.co/zBqGPm4lR7
“Take a walk around Glasgow and see streets named after slave owners.”
Stephen Mullen, who tweets under the name of his 2022 book Glasgow Sugar Aristocracy, said SNP and Green councillors had done more than Labour in Scotland to address the country’s imperial past.
The Glasgow University academic said: “SNP local administrations have contributed to Scotland’s imperial reckoning with two slavery investigations (Glasgow and Edinburgh).
“The Labour Party contributed to Scotland’s amnesia around slavery, naming ‘The Merchant City’ in 1990.
“I’d sit this one out.”
Mullen, a research associate in history, wrote a report for Glasgow city council in 2022 which detailed the city’s connections with the slave trade and which resulted in an official apology from the local authority’s SNP leader Susan Aitken.
Edinburgh undertook similar research under its previous joint SNP and Labour administration. Under Labour’s Cammy Day, the city council last year accepted recommendations put forward by Geoff Palmer, which included an official apology.
Turning his attention to the Scottish Parliament, Mullen said Scottish Labour had “remained generally silent” in contrast to the SNP on the country’s imperial past.
READ MORE: Glasgow won't 'rush' to change street names linked to slavery
He added: “SNP politicians were also the most critical of Scottish/British involvement with slavery in Scottish Parliament 1999-2019.
“Scottish Labour remained generally silent, consistent with the party’s British Nationalist ethos.
“Scottish Labour MSPs have a tentative record in supporting motions aimed at addressing Scotlands slavery past, exemplified by lukewarm support in votes. Compare and contrast with SNP and Green Party.
“In other words, Labour activists shouldn’t be attempting to politicise issues around Scotland’s imperial reckoning with Empire.
“Scottish Labour have a demonstrably weaker track record compared to the SNP and even the Scottish Green Party.”
Mullen also criticised Glasgow Labour MSP Paul Sweeney, an architecture and history buff, who recently proposed rebuilding the Tower of Empire from the 1938 Empire Exhibition, during an interview with The Herald.
Sweeney replied: “Your assertion that rebuilding one of Scotland’s great lost art deco icons somehow reflects my endorsement of imperialism is quite far-fetched and polemical. I would support its critical interpretation if it were. That doesn't mean its architectural merit can't be appreciated.”
He added: “Those recent investigations were supported by Labour. The naming of Glasgow's Old Town as 'Merchant City' over a generation ago was promoted by officials at the Scottish Development Agency rather than by politicians.”
Scottish Labour were approached for comment.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel