SCOTTISH ministers are “open to closing loopholes” in tackling wildlife crime following the publication of a report investigating whether an animal charity should be given greater powers.
The Scottish Society for the Protection of Animals (SSPCA) task force published a review into the lack of powers that the animal charity has in relation to wildlife crime, and whether they should be given further responsibilities, such as the ability to collect evidence.
The report, published on Tuesday but dated October 22, 2022, set out three different scenarios for the SSPCA going forward.
READ MORE: Stephen Flynn CAUTIONED by Speaker after questioning Rishi Sunak's honesty
This ranged from giving them powers to seize evidence and apply for warrants, but not going so far as allowing officers to make an arrest, to giving the SSPCA slightly more powers to seize evidence during an investigation, or to engage in “enhanced partnership working”.
The review recommended the third option, due to a lack of “readily forthcoming” institutional support from Police Scotland, the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service (COPFS) and the National Wildlife Crime Unit (NWCU).
This is due to concerns over “primacy of responsibility, access to intelligence or interference with other cases and health and safety risks to personnel”, the report said.
The publication of the report was raised in Holyrood on Wednesday during portfolio questions.
Mark Ruskell (pictured above), the Scottish Greens environment spokesperson, “Barriers under existing powers mean that SSPCA inspectors who are already on the ground investigating animal abuse are prevented from seizing and securing evidence of wildlife-related crimes.
“And inspectors are further limited to enforcing powers only on living animals with their hands tied if a wild animal was found dead.
“So does the minister agree that this is inexcusable? And will she close these loopholes in future stages of the Wildlife Management Bill?”
Environment Minister Gillian Martin replied: “He'll know that when I was in the same committee as him in the last term we heard exactly that kind of concern being raised about SSPCA officers not being able to act in certain situations that they found that there had been animal cruelty, particularly in wildlife.
READ MORE: Fergus Ewing 'set to lose party whip' after vote against Lorna Slater
“So I guess the report that's been published today has outlined what the SSPCA can do in this space.
“I'm absolutely open to what we can do to support them to do that and close those loopholes.”
Earlier, Deputy Scottish Tory leader Meghan Gallacher had asked Martin what “reassurances she can provide to ensure the SSPCA are fully supported”.
Martin responded: “We will do everything in consultation with the SSPCA to make sure they’re supported to carry out any duties should we decide to give them to them.”
Susan Davies, chief executive of the Scottish Seabird Centre who led the review, said in the recommendations: “It is evident that without the full institutional support of COPFS, PS and the NWCU an extension of powers, whatever the scope of those might be, to the SSPCA would be fraught.
“Such institutional support is not readily forthcoming due particularly due to concerns over primacy of responsibility, access to intelligence or interference with other cases and health and safety risks to personnel.”
READ MORE: Tory MP Simon Hoare defends meeting loyalist paramilitary groups
Davies added that there is a “strong commitment to partnership working” to tackle wildlife crime, and said the third scenario was the most fitting course of action, adding that additional control will come through the licensing of grouse moors.
The recommendations include setting up a “more direct route”, rather than through 101, for the SSPCA to highlight a potential crime and seek a follow-up from police.
There would also be further training for police officers on wildlife crime issues and a stronger focus on educating the public.
Martin said she would provide a response to the recommendations in “due course”.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel