A TORY MP reportedly met with loyalist paramilitaries in Northern Ireland as a personal fact-finding mission, a Westminster committee has said.
The Belfast Telegraph reported that Simon Hoare, chair of the Northern Ireland Affairs Committee, held separate meetings with UDA and UVF figures earlier this month to encourage them to buy into the Windsor Framework.
Hoare told the newspaper he had attended the meetings in a personal capacity.
The UDA and UVF are illegal paramilitary organisations. While both are on ceasefire, they have been linked with ongoing criminality.
Police said earlier this year they were monitoring tensions in loyalist areas following the unveiling of the Windsor Framework, designed to ease trading barriers between Northern Ireland and the rest of the UK.
READ MORE: What is in the new deal on the Northern Ireland Protocol?
Denise Mullen, a former councillor, was one of those to speak out against the meeting.
She was three when she witnessed the shooting of her father, Denis. She said she was "disgusted" by the meetings.
"It’s wrong,” she told the BBC.
"Are the PSNI going to get involved now with this Conservative guy coming over and meeting the UVF?
"Would he like to come and meet me? Would he like to come and meet my mother, who at 80 years of age, for the last 20 years has been sitting there almost numb now?
"All that she can talk about is reliving that night my father was shot. I’d like him to come and visit me."
On Wednesday, the Northern Ireland Affairs Committee released a statement about the meetings - which said they were not an attempt to represent the committee.
The statement said: “The chair’s visit to Northern Ireland was to fact-find to inform House and committee discussion on paramilitary activity and organised crime in Northern Ireland.
“The visit was not an attempt to represent the committee or communicate its views.”
READ MORE: The Brexit deal for Northern Ireland is another UK insult to Scotland
Hoare told the Belfast Telegraph: “I was there to listen directly to a group of people in Northern Ireland who are so angry and frustrated.
“It was a listening exercise to help inform my understanding of a group of people who are hard to reach.”
He added: “I will talk to anybody in and around Northern Ireland who is prepared to talk to me.
“You can talk to all sorts of people about all sorts of things. It doesn’t mean you agree with them.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel