THE Minister for Independence has insisted he has “not at any stage” advocated for devo-max and that the SNP will focus on an “overt campaign in favour of independence”.
Last week, the Daily Record reported that Jamie Hepburn said the SNP should “consider” a multi-option independence referendum.
However, Hepburn insisted that he did not argue that devo-max, a wide-ranging term but essentially full fiscal autonomy for Scotland, should be included as a third option during any independence referendum.
READ MORE: RECAP: Humza Yousaf launches new white paper on Scottish independence
He told journalists in Glasgow on Monday that the only constitutional option he would advocate for would be full independence.
Last week, Hepburn was asked by the Record about a possible deal between Labour and the SNP on a multi-option referendum, if Keir Starmer found himself in Number 10 after the next General Election.
Hepburn said it was something that the party should “consider” but only if it was a possibility, and said he supported calls for the Scottish Parliament to be given further powers.
The Minister for Independence described devo-max as “sub-optimal” but argued it would be better than the current devolution settlement, which has seen repeated attacks on its powers from the Westminster Tories.
However, Hepburn added: “But by comparison with being an independent actor on the global stage, being able to determine our own relationship with the rest of Europe, I don't think it's as good an option.”
The issue was raised during a press conference following the publication of the fourth independence whitepaper in the Building a New Scotland series.
At a sit down with press journalists following the paper publication, First Minister Humza Yousaf said he “read carefully” the details of Hepburn’s remarks in the Record article.
“He made it absolutely and abundantly clear that independence is what we are pursuing, independence and nothing less,” Yousaf said.
READ MORE: Police launch new partygate probe as fresh lockdown breaches alleged
“If other parties want to throw in devo-max and whatever else into the mix, that's for them to make the case.
“I'm not entertaining anything other than the mandate that we were given and the mandate we were given was for independence referendum, and that is what we are pursuing independence nothing less.”
Hepburn interjected to clarify his comments, adding: “Can I just be clear, I have not at any stage advocated the SNP should pursue anything other than an overt clear campaign in favour of independence.
“It is the only constitutional option I'm interested in, the SNP is interested in, and that's what we will pursue.”
It comes as the FM revealed that Scotland could ditch King Charles as head of state and implement a written constitution within three to five years of a Yes vote.
Elsewhere, activists praised the bid to ban nuclear weapons from Scotland in a written constitution.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel