PLANS to use dredged material from Girvan Harbour to shore up erosion at the town’s golf course have been shelved after toxic metals were discovered in the harbour sediment.
An Ayrshire Roads Alliance report to the Ayrshire Shared Services Committee stated: “Sediment sampling from Girvan Harbour was recently carried out.
“The outcome of the laboratory testing showed high levels of Nickel, Dibutyltin and organic matter.
“This being the case the sediment from Girvan Harbour is not suitable for beach replenishment and will not be used at Girvan Golf Course.”
READ MORE: Alba's 'Scotland United' plan gets backing of third of Scots
The use of dredged material had been suggested as a short term measure to address erosion at the golf course.
The management plan had stated: “Dredging of the harbour at Girvan should continue. Using the dredged material to nourish nearby beaches to the north should be considered as an alternative to offshore disposal.”
The medium to long term plan had acknowledged the need to upgrade the coastal defences at the location.
Girvan Councillor Alec Clark said: “Do we know where the source of the deposits are emanating from. It seems strange. It would have been good to use this to help the sea defences.”
Kevin Braidwood, Head of Ayrshire Roads Alliance, said: “The deposits of nickel and other materials is down to anti-fouling paint applied to vessels down the years.
“It erodes off the base of the vessel and falls to the bottom of the harbour. It is within the silt lifted out as part of dredging process.
“These are controlled materials and that is why we have to go through the process of getting a licence so that we are able to dump the material.
“We used to dump that material it in the north channel, but we now have to take it to a controlled dump.
“It won’t delay the dredging process. It is just a process we have to go through and analyse what is on the bed of the harbour. ”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here