SUELLA Braverman has conceded that women trafficked into the UK for sexual exploitation could be deported under measures to tackle illegal migration.
The Home Secretary said there are no “blanket exclusions” but argued they could receive protection by co-operating with a police investigation or showing hard evidence of modern slavery.
Former prime minister Theresa May has been among the Conservative critics warning the Illegal Migration Bill to “stop the boats” could harm efforts to tackle human trafficking.
The Home Secretary said victims “could claim an exemption”, but she stressed the need to tackle people “claiming to be victims of modern slavery when they patently are not” to thwart removal from the UK under the legislation.
READ MORE: Sexist abortion laws in UK burden women with relics of a bygone era
Braverman was challenged at the Home Affairs Committee by its chair, Dame Diana Johnson, over whether exploited women could still be arrested and removed.
The Cabinet minister said: “We take our commitments to modern slavery very seriously. We are not including blanket exclusions in our legislation.”
She insisted the Government has “struck the right balance” and that “genuine victims of modern slavery can still put in a claim”.
Braverman said they can receive protection if there is “compelling evidence for their reasonable grounds” or if “they are part of a police investigation”.
Dame Diana, a Labour MP, warned: “It’s quite clear that particularly victims of trafficking for sexual exploitation find it very difficult to come forward.”
Braverman was challenged on the promise to tackle the backlog of asylum cases, insisting the “legacy” backlog predating June last year has fallen by around 17,000 claims.
But she said the overall numbers are rising and the total backlog is “absolutely impossible to ever get that number down to zero” because the “boats keep coming”.
Dame Diana said: “It seems to me you have a backlog of backlogs now, you’re just building backlogs on backlogs.”
Braverman replied: “No I wouldn’t say that, I would say we’ve got a caseload of cases.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel