A MUSLIM scholar who has been living under a fatwa for two decades is hoping his case will get more attention from Police Scotland after the organisation admitted to being institutionally racist.
Paigham Mustafa, who lives in Scotland, claims the police have not “adequately addressed” the threat on his life from the religious edict calling for “action to be taken against him”.
A fatwa - which was issued to Mustafa by several mosques in the west of Scotland - is a decree from an Islamic relgious leader and in Mustafa's case means the threat of execution.
Mustafa is believed to be the only person in the UK living under such a threat since Salman Rushdie left the UK for the US.
He claims the force’s lack of action is because it "fears being branded Islamaphobic".
READ MORE: Labour £28bn U-turn will damage Scotland's green potential, says Flynn
In 2021, Police Scotland said hate law does not apply to Mustafa’s case as it requires an intention to stir up hatred against a group rather than an individual, but Mustafa said this raises questions about whether individuals are sufficiently protected from hate crimes committed by institutions.
After Chief Constable Sir Iain Livingstone last month admitted the Police Scotland is “institutionally racist and discriminatory”, Mustafa said he hopes there can be further scrutiny of hate crimes and action taken over his case.
He told The National: “When I listened to the Chief Constable’s comments I realised I felt vindicated that comments I had previously made were correct and now I am hoping things will change and we can move forward.
“There’s been nothing from the police so far. They have ticked the box in terms of an investigation but they have done nothing useful and I think the reasons behind that are coming forward now.”
A statement sent out by his publishing company Signat said Mustafa finds the inaction around his case “deeply concerning”.
Chief Inspector Jamie Harrison wrote to Mustafa after the investigation to say no criminality was established after advice was sought from the Islamic community and the Police Scotland equality and diversity unit.
READ MORE: UK Government to scrap windfall tax if oil and gas prices fall further
Signat said Mustafa is critical of Police Scotland’s decision to seek advice from the “very institutions accused of spreading hate, questioning the validity and impartiality of the investigation”.
The statement went on: “Sir Iain Livingstone’s acknowledgement of institutional racism and discrimination within Police Scotland is a significant development.
“It highlights the urgent need for the police to address these deep-rooted issues and demonstrates the importance of championing equality and becoming an anti-racist service.
“To ensure justice and equal protection for all individuals, it is crucial that the police thoroughly investigate hate crimes, regardless of the identities of the victims or the institutions involved.
“In conclusion, Police Scotland’s acknowledgement of institutional racism is an essential step towards reforming the police force. However, the case of Paigham Mustafa highlights the need for further scrutiny and improvement in handling hate crimes.
“Protecting individuals from all forms of discrimination and ensuring their safety should be a fundamental duty of law enforcement agencies.”
A Police Scotland spokesperson said: “A thorough investigation of Mr Mustafa’s concerns was carried out and no criminality was established.
“Advice was also sought from the Islamic community and Police Scotland’s Equality and Diversity Unit in order to provide the most suitable advice to Mr Mustafa.
“In addition, trained officers carried out an extensive security survey for Mr Mustafa and the outcome of this has been communicated with him.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules here