ACTIONS taken in the police inquiry into the SNP ’s finances have been “proportionate and necessary”, the chief constable of Police Scotland has said.
The investigation – dubbed Operation Branchform – began in 2021, reaching its peak in April this year with the arrests of Nicola Sturgeon’s husband – and former SNP chief executive – Peter Murrell and then party treasurer Colin Beattie.
Both men were released without charge pending further investigation.
As well as the arrests, searches were carried out at a number of properties, including Murrell and Sturgeon’s home – where a police tent was erected in the garden – and SNP headquarters in Edinburgh.
Some close to the party – including ex-Sturgeon aide Noel Dolan and its former head of communications, Murray Foote – viewed the actions of police as heavy handed.
Foote described it as a "grim spectacle", and added: "I’m prepared to gamble the Foote £5 on no charges at the end of all this.
"Should that bet be a winner, then the police and Crown Office will find themselves together in a very deep hole."
But, speaking to the Sunday Times, Livingstone defended the probe.
“Operation Branchform (the police inquiry into the SNP’s finances) has been a long-going investigation,” he said.
“Police Scotland were asked to look at a number of assertions that were being made – we always do that, it is our duty – then we seek evidence to see if there is any substance in them.
READ MORE: Murray Foote predicts the SNP will face 'no charges' from police probe
“Then, as matters progress, at an appropriate time we discuss that with independent prosecutors under the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service.”
The senior officer – who is due to leave the post in August – added: “When we carry out the search we will put processes in place that are proportionate and necessary to the action being carried out and to the inquiry and its terms, and I am satisfied that the steps we have taken are proportionate and necessary.
“Stating opinion or speculation without having the knowledge and information that exists is damaging… because it infringes the rights of individuals.
“Operation Branchform has integrity, it is expected to have rigour. If the operation had not been pursued I would rightly have been accused of neglect of duty.”
Asked specifically about the tent erected in the front garden of the former first minister, the chief constable said: “I was aware of it and was supportive of it because I knew the circumstances and the rationale for utilising it, and part of it was to protect rights of individuals.”
Livingstone would not be drawn on any future arrests relating to the inquiry.
Reports in the media previously attempted to suggest that the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service (COPFS) had delayed the approval of a search warrant for SNP HQ and Sturgeon’s home for two weeks.
Livingstone denied this at the time, saying “ill-informed speculation” would only risk damaging the ongoing probe and that police would “fiercely resist” any attempt to exert political pressure over the investigation.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel