ELECTED provosts in Scotland "just makes sense," Greater Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham has said during a visit to Larbert.
The Labour politician said it would most likely lead to greater collaboration between cities in Scotland and England – without the need for Westminster or Holyrood to step in.
The plans for elected provosts were a central tenet in a report released by Gordon Brown on the future of the UK last year.
Labour have not formally taken these on board – but Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar has said they are currently under consideration by the party.
Speaking to the Press Association as he visited Alexander Dennis’s Larbert site earlier today to see the first 50 new “Bee Network” buses for Greater Manchester, Mr Burnham said he could sympathise with the SNP’s anxiety over the reach of the government in Westminster.
“I’ve had my frustrations and to be honest with you, I feel like I understand the sentiments in Scotland better because we all have our frustrations about the way Westminster treats the rest of the UK, the regions in England but also Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.
“I think people may not realise in Scotland how much we feel the same in the north of England.
“We saw it in the pandemic, the way Greater Manchester was treated by the Westminster Government. They feel they can do things to us that they wouldn’t dare do in London and the South East.
“That’s what’s got to change. Personally, I think we’ve got to rewire Britain to make it better, and that includes more devolution to us and to Scotland.”
READ MORE: Gordon Brown calls for move from 'nationalism to patriotism'
Mr Burnham added: “If I could pick up the phone to the elected mayors or provost of Edinburgh, Glasgow, Aberdeen or Dundee, we’d all start working more.”
It would result in greater collaboration between businesses in Scotland and England without the need for national governments, he added.
The Mancunian mayor's intervention came as Humza Yousaf criticised Mr Sarwar and Scottish Labour for staying silent as the Tories launched attacks to "undermine devolution".
He also said how he understands the SNP’s claims that the Westminster Government is “destroying devolution”.
The Labour politician cited his own conflict with the UK Government during the Covid-19 pandemic, when he accused the Tories of “bullying” his region into accepting less than the requested £65 million business support package.
Which comes as First Minister Humza Yousaf hit out at the UK Government and claimed Scotland’s deposit return scheme could be scrapped after it failed to grant an Internal Market Act exemption that means glass can be included.
I’ve had my frustrations [with Westminster] and to be honest with you, I feel like I understand the sentiments in Scotland better because we all have our frustrations about the way Westminster treats the rest of the UK, the regions in England but also Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.
“I think people may not realise in Scotland how much we feel the same in the north of England.
“We saw it in the pandemic, the way Greater Manchester was treated by the Westminster Government. They feel they can do things to us that they wouldn’t dare do in London and the South East.
“That’s what’s got to change. Personally, I think we’ve got to rewire Britain to make it better, and that includes more devolution to us and to Scotland.”
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel