ONCE in a while, a book comes along that demands a closer look. How Britain Broke The World is such a volume. Written by Arthur Snell – who wants “Britain to do better as a country” – and published by Canbury Press, it is a devasting account of how the UK messed up its relations with other countries to such a degree that it threatens world order.
Snell is a former British diplomat and a first-hand observer of the way the UK foreign policy has added to the mess the world is in. He claims that since Tony Blair’s first election victory in 1997, Britain has contributed to the fracturing of the global order. Snell is no Scottish nationalist. Indeed, his understanding of Scotland some might think embarrassing.
He says that Britain’s foreign policy is constantly shaped by imperial hubris. The strange idea that Britain knows best that it can dispense wisdom and guidance around the world when recent actions should give a pause for thought.
A misplaced British belief that it has a better understanding of what is good for most people than those people have themselves. Sound familiar?
As far as Brexit is concerned, Snell says that “Britain sought to negotiate an agreement that would make it harder to trade with its number one trading partner and the world’s largest economic bloc. It was a trade deal whose desired outcome was to erect new barriers to trade. Inevitably the process was fraught with tension and rancour. A new trade war between the UK and the EU cannot be ruled out.”
Britain’s fixation with its colonial past and its misplaced national self-importance have been a constant and unhelpful factor informing policy with former colonies such as India, he says.
According to Snell, the Iraq War could not have happened without the forceful lobbying of Blair and the legal creativity of British lawyers and without the contribution of the British intelligence service.
If a country’s intelligence services are the truest expression of a nation’s character, as John Le Carré says, then applied to the case for the war against Iraq it suggests that Britain is, at the very least, desperate to please, delusional and self-important, and slapdash.
Snell points out that in the mid-1980s, the UK had around 3000 diplomats posted around the world. By the mid-1990s, this figure had fallen to 2500. By 2018 this number was around 1700, the lowest in modern British history. In the same period, France posted roughly twice as many diplomats abroad. Good luck getting help if you’re stranded abroad.
The idea of an expert cadre, considering policy against a wider evidence base and advising ministers on the best path to take, or offering an informed critique of a proposed policy, simply does not exist in the British system, says Snell.
READ MORE: Just Stop Oil disrupt rugby union final at Twickenham
Snell underscores the fact that Britain operates the world’s largest network of offshore financial institutions ensuring that criminal money can be routed across the world.
He claims that Britain’s financial institutions including its network of offshore tax havens make the UK the global leader in money laundering. By doing this Britain helps prop up the thieving regimes both corrupt countries such as Russia. And the UK Parliament, fixated on short-term tactical game and media posturing, shows itself incapable of taking strategic decisions.
Ironically these overseas territories are self-governing democracies responsible for their own affairs and reliant upon the UK solely for defence and foreign relations. A status – if not an occupation – that many Scots might envy.
Snell also takes aim at Britain’s private schools. He quotes headmaster Andrew Halls describing Britain’s private schools, saying “they are finishing schools for the children of oligarchs”.
And he quotes Max Bergmann, former senior official in Barack Obama’s State department, who said: “Uprooting Kremlin-linked oligarchs will be a challenge given the close ties between Russian money and Britain’s ruling Conservative party, the press, and it’s real estate and financial industry.”
Snell reminds us that Suspicious Activity Reports succeeded in stopping less than 1% of the estimated £100 billion illicit funds the passes through the UK each year. So, for every £1bn that is detected, £99bn of dodgy money washes through the UK annually. In the UK, around 80 staff are expected to analyse and investigate nearly half a million reports annually.
He contends that what is almost certainly at play is the “peculiarly British aversion to long-term planning over short-term gain”. Particularly when that gain stuffs the bank accounts of the upper classes.
Faced with the choice between making it easy for money launderers and criminals to spend their money in London and the long-term global benefits of integrity, Britain has always kept the dirty money flowing.
That £99 billion a year buys a nation of blind eyes, says Snell.
More exciting guests are lined up for the TNT Show. Join us on Wednesday at 7pm on IndyLive.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel